TY - JOUR
T1 - Pitfalls in the diagnosis of thoracic aortic dissection at CT angiography
AU - Batra, Poonam
AU - Bigoni, Brian
AU - Manning, John
AU - Aberle, Denise R.
AU - Brown, Kathleen
AU - Hart, Eric
AU - Goldin, Jonathan
PY - 2000/1/1
Y1 - 2000/1/1
N2 - Two hundred seventy-five computed tomographic (CT) angiograms of the thoracic aorta were obtained over a period of approximately 4 years in patients with suspected or known aortic dissection. In all cases, unenhanced images were initially obtained, followed by contrast material-enhanced images. A variety of pitfalls were encountered that mimicked aortic dissection. These pitfalls were attributable to technical factors (eg, improper timing of contrast material administration relative to image acquisition); streak artifacts generated by high-attenuation material, high-contrast interfaces, or cardiac motion; periaortic structures (eg, aortic arch branches, mediastinal veins, pericardial recess, thymus, atelectasis, pleural thickening or effusion adjacent to the aorta); aortic wall motion and normal aortic sinuses; aortic variations such as congenital ductus diverticulum and acquired aortic aneurysm with thrombus; and penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer. Although several of these pitfalls are easy to recognize and therefore unlikely to present a diagnostic problem, others are potentially confusing. Familiarity with these common pitfalls, coupled with a knowledge of normal intrathoracic anatomy, will facilitate recognition of true aortic dissection and help avoid misdiagnosis at thoracic aortic CT angiography.
AB - Two hundred seventy-five computed tomographic (CT) angiograms of the thoracic aorta were obtained over a period of approximately 4 years in patients with suspected or known aortic dissection. In all cases, unenhanced images were initially obtained, followed by contrast material-enhanced images. A variety of pitfalls were encountered that mimicked aortic dissection. These pitfalls were attributable to technical factors (eg, improper timing of contrast material administration relative to image acquisition); streak artifacts generated by high-attenuation material, high-contrast interfaces, or cardiac motion; periaortic structures (eg, aortic arch branches, mediastinal veins, pericardial recess, thymus, atelectasis, pleural thickening or effusion adjacent to the aorta); aortic wall motion and normal aortic sinuses; aortic variations such as congenital ductus diverticulum and acquired aortic aneurysm with thrombus; and penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer. Although several of these pitfalls are easy to recognize and therefore unlikely to present a diagnostic problem, others are potentially confusing. Familiarity with these common pitfalls, coupled with a knowledge of normal intrathoracic anatomy, will facilitate recognition of true aortic dissection and help avoid misdiagnosis at thoracic aortic CT angiography.
KW - Aorta, CT, 94.12916, 94.74
KW - Aorta, dissection, 94.74, 94.93
KW - Aortography, 94.121
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034145864&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034145864&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1148/radiographics.20.2.g00mc04309
DO - 10.1148/radiographics.20.2.g00mc04309
M3 - Article
C2 - 10715333
AN - SCOPUS:0034145864
SN - 0271-5333
VL - 20
SP - 309
EP - 320
JO - Radiographics
JF - Radiographics
IS - 2
ER -