Abstract
This essay examines the Republic’s most important argument against democracy, and claims that it remains, even amidst the dominance of democratic theory, a powerful critique not only of Athenian democracy but also of representative democracy. Plato’s basic idea is that a regime is inherently defective if it gives people a right to participate in political office whether or not they have demonstrated any qualifications for doing so. I examine several ways in which modern and contemporary democratic theorists respond to Plato’s critique, and argue that they are problematic. Perhaps Plato was right, then: democracy is not the best possible political system.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Virtue, Happiness, Knowledge |
Subtitle of host publication | Themes from the Work of Gail Fine and Terence Irwin |
Editors | David O Brink, Susan Sauvé Meyer, Christopher Shields |
Publisher | Oxford Universtity Press |
ISBN (Print) | 9780198817277 |
State | Published - 2018 |