Plato against Democracy

A Defense

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

This essay examines the Republic’s most important argument against democracy, and claims that it remains, even amidst the dominance of democratic theory, a powerful critique not only of Athenian democracy but also of representative democracy. Plato’s basic idea is that a regime is inherently defective if it gives people a right to participate in political office whether or not they have demonstrated any qualifications for doing so. I examine several ways in which modern and contemporary democratic theorists respond to Plato’s critique, and argue that they are problematic. Perhaps Plato was right, then: democracy is not the best possible political system.
Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationVirtue, Happiness, Knowledge
Subtitle of host publicationThemes from the Work of Gail Fine and Terence Irwin
EditorsDavid O Brink, Susan Sauvé Meyer, Christopher Shields
PublisherOxford Universtity Press
ISBN (Print)9780198817277
StatePublished - 2018

Fingerprint

Plato
democracy
representative democracy
political system
qualification
republic
regime

Cite this

Kraut, R. H. (2018). Plato against Democracy: A Defense. In D. O. Brink, S. Sauvé Meyer, & C. Shields (Eds.), Virtue, Happiness, Knowledge: Themes from the Work of Gail Fine and Terence Irwin Oxford Universtity Press.
Kraut, Richard H. / Plato against Democracy : A Defense. Virtue, Happiness, Knowledge: Themes from the Work of Gail Fine and Terence Irwin. editor / David O Brink ; Susan Sauvé Meyer ; Christopher Shields. Oxford Universtity Press, 2018.
@inbook{ae4285cd2ccc49218869a991f051124b,
title = "Plato against Democracy: A Defense",
abstract = "This essay examines the Republic’s most important argument against democracy, and claims that it remains, even amidst the dominance of democratic theory, a powerful critique not only of Athenian democracy but also of representative democracy. Plato’s basic idea is that a regime is inherently defective if it gives people a right to participate in political office whether or not they have demonstrated any qualifications for doing so. I examine several ways in which modern and contemporary democratic theorists respond to Plato’s critique, and argue that they are problematic. Perhaps Plato was right, then: democracy is not the best possible political system.",
author = "Kraut, {Richard H}",
note = "DOI:10.1093/oso/9780198817277.003.0005",
year = "2018",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780198817277",
editor = "Brink, {David O} and {Sauv{\'e} Meyer}, Susan and Christopher Shields",
booktitle = "Virtue, Happiness, Knowledge",
publisher = "Oxford Universtity Press",

}

Kraut, RH 2018, Plato against Democracy: A Defense. in DO Brink, S Sauvé Meyer & C Shields (eds), Virtue, Happiness, Knowledge: Themes from the Work of Gail Fine and Terence Irwin. Oxford Universtity Press.

Plato against Democracy : A Defense. / Kraut, Richard H.

Virtue, Happiness, Knowledge: Themes from the Work of Gail Fine and Terence Irwin. ed. / David O Brink; Susan Sauvé Meyer; Christopher Shields. Oxford Universtity Press, 2018.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Plato against Democracy

T2 - A Defense

AU - Kraut, Richard H

N1 - DOI:10.1093/oso/9780198817277.003.0005

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - This essay examines the Republic’s most important argument against democracy, and claims that it remains, even amidst the dominance of democratic theory, a powerful critique not only of Athenian democracy but also of representative democracy. Plato’s basic idea is that a regime is inherently defective if it gives people a right to participate in political office whether or not they have demonstrated any qualifications for doing so. I examine several ways in which modern and contemporary democratic theorists respond to Plato’s critique, and argue that they are problematic. Perhaps Plato was right, then: democracy is not the best possible political system.

AB - This essay examines the Republic’s most important argument against democracy, and claims that it remains, even amidst the dominance of democratic theory, a powerful critique not only of Athenian democracy but also of representative democracy. Plato’s basic idea is that a regime is inherently defective if it gives people a right to participate in political office whether or not they have demonstrated any qualifications for doing so. I examine several ways in which modern and contemporary democratic theorists respond to Plato’s critique, and argue that they are problematic. Perhaps Plato was right, then: democracy is not the best possible political system.

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780198817277

BT - Virtue, Happiness, Knowledge

A2 - Brink, David O

A2 - Sauvé Meyer, Susan

A2 - Shields, Christopher

PB - Oxford Universtity Press

ER -

Kraut RH. Plato against Democracy: A Defense. In Brink DO, Sauvé Meyer S, Shields C, editors, Virtue, Happiness, Knowledge: Themes from the Work of Gail Fine and Terence Irwin. Oxford Universtity Press. 2018