TY - JOUR
T1 - Play Sports for a Quieter Brain
T2 - Evidence From Division I Collegiate Athletes
AU - Krizman, Jennifer
AU - Lindley, Tory
AU - Bonacina, Silvia
AU - Colegrove, Danielle
AU - White-Schwoch, Travis
AU - Kraus, Nina
N1 - Funding Information:
These results motivate athletics overall and engagement in athletic interventions for populations that struggle with sensory processing, such as individuals with language disorders. Also, because head injuries can disrupt these same auditory processes, it is important to consider how auditory processing enhancements may offset injury. frequency-following response neural noise auditory processing neural plasticity edited-state corrected-proof typesetter ts1 The authors thank the members of the Auditory Neuroscience Laboratory, past and present, for their help with data collection and Dr Cynthia LaBella and Trent Nicol for comments on an earlier version of the manuscript. The following author declared potential conflicts of interest: N.K. received a grant from National Institutes of Health (National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [NINDS]; R01-NS102500) and Knowles Hearing Center, Northwestern University. This research was funded by NIH R01-NS102500 and the Knowles Hearing Center, Northwestern University.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Author(s).
PY - 2020/3/1
Y1 - 2020/3/1
N2 - Background: Playing sports has many benefits, including boosting physical, cardiovascular, and mental fitness. We tested whether athletic benefits extend to sensory processing—specifically auditory processing—as measured by the frequency-following response (FFR), a scalp-recorded electrophysiological potential that captures neural activity predominately from the auditory midbrain to complex sounds. Hypothesis: Given that FFR amplitude is sensitive to experience, with enrichment enhancing FFRs and injury reducing them, we hypothesized that playing sports is a form of enrichment that results in greater FFR amplitude. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Level of Evidence: Level 3. Methods: We measured FFRs to the speech syllable “da” in 495 student-athletes across 19 Division I teams and 493 age- and sex-matched controls and compared them on 3 measures of FFR amplitude: amplitude of the response, amplitude of the background noise, and the ratio of these 2 measures. Results: Athletes have larger responses to sound than nonathletes, driven by a reduction in their level of background neural noise. Conclusion: These findings suggest that playing sports increases the gain of an auditory signal by turning down the background noise. This mode of enhancement may be tied to the overall fitness level of athletes and/or the heightened need of an athlete to engage with and respond to auditory stimuli during competition. Clinical Relevance: These results motivate athletics overall and engagement in athletic interventions for populations that struggle with sensory processing, such as individuals with language disorders. Also, because head injuries can disrupt these same auditory processes, it is important to consider how auditory processing enhancements may offset injury.
AB - Background: Playing sports has many benefits, including boosting physical, cardiovascular, and mental fitness. We tested whether athletic benefits extend to sensory processing—specifically auditory processing—as measured by the frequency-following response (FFR), a scalp-recorded electrophysiological potential that captures neural activity predominately from the auditory midbrain to complex sounds. Hypothesis: Given that FFR amplitude is sensitive to experience, with enrichment enhancing FFRs and injury reducing them, we hypothesized that playing sports is a form of enrichment that results in greater FFR amplitude. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Level of Evidence: Level 3. Methods: We measured FFRs to the speech syllable “da” in 495 student-athletes across 19 Division I teams and 493 age- and sex-matched controls and compared them on 3 measures of FFR amplitude: amplitude of the response, amplitude of the background noise, and the ratio of these 2 measures. Results: Athletes have larger responses to sound than nonathletes, driven by a reduction in their level of background neural noise. Conclusion: These findings suggest that playing sports increases the gain of an auditory signal by turning down the background noise. This mode of enhancement may be tied to the overall fitness level of athletes and/or the heightened need of an athlete to engage with and respond to auditory stimuli during competition. Clinical Relevance: These results motivate athletics overall and engagement in athletic interventions for populations that struggle with sensory processing, such as individuals with language disorders. Also, because head injuries can disrupt these same auditory processes, it is important to consider how auditory processing enhancements may offset injury.
KW - auditory processing
KW - frequency-following response
KW - neural noise
KW - neural plasticity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85077163923&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85077163923&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1941738119892275
DO - 10.1177/1941738119892275
M3 - Article
C2 - 31813316
AN - SCOPUS:85077163923
SN - 1941-7381
VL - 12
SP - 154
EP - 158
JO - Sports Health
JF - Sports Health
IS - 2
ER -