TY - JOUR
T1 - Pleural gas analysis for detection of alveolopleural fistulae
AU - Bharat, Ankit
AU - Graf, Nicole
AU - Cassidy, Emily
AU - Smith, Sean
AU - Gillespie, Colin
AU - Meyerson, Shari
AU - Sporn, Peter H.S.
AU - Sznajder, Jacob I.
AU - Decamp, Malcolm M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.
PY - 2015/6/1
Y1 - 2015/6/1
N2 - Purpose Visual inspection (VI) of bubbles in the chest drainage unit does not differentiate a true leak of alveolopleural fistula (APF) from a false leak. We hypothesized that detection of elevated levels of carbon dioxide, increase in oxygen content, or both, in pleural gas upon the administration of supplemental oxygen would accurately identify APF. Description Prospective study comparing pleural gas analysis (GA) with VI to detect APF after surgical lobectomy (n = 50). Evaluation APF was found in 22 (44%) patients at the time of analysis. VI revealed air bubbles in 31 (62%) patients, indicating the presence of APF, of whom 12 (38.7%) were false leaks. VI failed to identify APF in 3 (6%) patients that resulted in post-tube removal pneumothorax. By contrast, GA accurately demonstrated APF in 21 patients, with only one false negative and no false positives. GA demonstrated better sensitivity (95.5% vs 86.4%), specificity (100% vs 57.1%), positive predictive value (100% vs 61.3%), and negative predictive value (96.6% vs 84.2%) compared to VI. Conclusions Pleural gas analysis is an effective technique to detect APF and can facilitate timely and safe chest tube removal.
AB - Purpose Visual inspection (VI) of bubbles in the chest drainage unit does not differentiate a true leak of alveolopleural fistula (APF) from a false leak. We hypothesized that detection of elevated levels of carbon dioxide, increase in oxygen content, or both, in pleural gas upon the administration of supplemental oxygen would accurately identify APF. Description Prospective study comparing pleural gas analysis (GA) with VI to detect APF after surgical lobectomy (n = 50). Evaluation APF was found in 22 (44%) patients at the time of analysis. VI revealed air bubbles in 31 (62%) patients, indicating the presence of APF, of whom 12 (38.7%) were false leaks. VI failed to identify APF in 3 (6%) patients that resulted in post-tube removal pneumothorax. By contrast, GA accurately demonstrated APF in 21 patients, with only one false negative and no false positives. GA demonstrated better sensitivity (95.5% vs 86.4%), specificity (100% vs 57.1%), positive predictive value (100% vs 61.3%), and negative predictive value (96.6% vs 84.2%) compared to VI. Conclusions Pleural gas analysis is an effective technique to detect APF and can facilitate timely and safe chest tube removal.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930901525&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84930901525&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.12.074
DO - 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.12.074
M3 - Article
C2 - 26046869
AN - SCOPUS:84930901525
SN - 0003-4975
VL - 99
SP - 2179
EP - 2182
JO - Annals of Thoracic Surgery
JF - Annals of Thoracic Surgery
IS - 6
ER -