TY - JOUR
T1 - Point of Reference
T2 - A Multisited Exploration of African Migration and Fertility in France
AU - Behrman, Julia A.
AU - Weitzman, Abigail
N1 - Funding Information:
This paper is supported with a grant from the National Science Foundation sponsor# SES 1918274. The authors are grateful to Michel Guillot, Michael White, Erica Soler, Jere Behrman, Maggie Frye, Jenny Trinitapoli, Sarah Hayford, Christie Sennott, and Doron Shiffer-Sebba for helpful feedback. We are grateful to the Centre Maurice Halbwachs for granting access to the data [Trajectoires et origines (TEO)—version complete—2008: (2008, fichier electronique), INED et INSEE (producteur), Centre Maurice Halbwachs (CMH, diffuseur)].
Funding Information:
This paper is supported with a grant from the National Science Foundation sponsor# SES 1918274. The authors are grateful to Michel Guillot, Michael White, Erica Soler, Jere Behrman, Maggie Frye, Jenny Trinitapoli, Sarah Hayford, Christie Sennott, and Doron Shiffer-Sebba for helpful feedback. We are grateful to the Centre Maurice Halbwachs for granting access to the data [Trajectoires et origines (TEO)—version complete—2008: (2008, fichier electronique), INED et INSEE (producteur), Centre Maurice Halbwachs (CMH, diffuseur)]. The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (grant number sponsor# SES 1918274).
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2022.
PY - 2022/9
Y1 - 2022/9
N2 - A considerable literature explores whether the fertility of migrants from high-fertility contexts converges with that of women in lower fertility destinations. Nonetheless, much of this research compares migrants’ reproductive outcomes to those of native-born women in destination countries. Drawing on research emphasizing the importance of transnational perspectives, we standardize and integrate data collected in France (the destination) and in six high-fertility African countries (the senders). We show that African migrants in our sample had higher children ever born (CEB) than native French women but lower CEB than women in corresponding origin countries. These findings suggest that socialization into pronatalist norms is an incomplete explanation for migrant fertility in the first generation, an insight that is overlooked when analyzing destination settings only. Next, we conduct multivariate analyses that weight migrants’ background characteristics to resemble women in both origin and destination countries. Findings indicate that observed differences between African migrants in France and women in African origin countries help explain differences in CEB between the two groups, which supports selection. We also demonstrate that African migrants in France had delayed transitions into first, second, and third births and lower completed fertility compared to women in origin countries, thus disputing the disruption hypothesis. Finally, we show that observed differences between African migrants in France and native French women explain differences in CEB between the two groups, which supports adaptation. These multifaceted findings on selection, disruption, and adaptation would be obscured by analyzing destination settings only, thus validating a multisited approach to migrant fertility.
AB - A considerable literature explores whether the fertility of migrants from high-fertility contexts converges with that of women in lower fertility destinations. Nonetheless, much of this research compares migrants’ reproductive outcomes to those of native-born women in destination countries. Drawing on research emphasizing the importance of transnational perspectives, we standardize and integrate data collected in France (the destination) and in six high-fertility African countries (the senders). We show that African migrants in our sample had higher children ever born (CEB) than native French women but lower CEB than women in corresponding origin countries. These findings suggest that socialization into pronatalist norms is an incomplete explanation for migrant fertility in the first generation, an insight that is overlooked when analyzing destination settings only. Next, we conduct multivariate analyses that weight migrants’ background characteristics to resemble women in both origin and destination countries. Findings indicate that observed differences between African migrants in France and women in African origin countries help explain differences in CEB between the two groups, which supports selection. We also demonstrate that African migrants in France had delayed transitions into first, second, and third births and lower completed fertility compared to women in origin countries, thus disputing the disruption hypothesis. Finally, we show that observed differences between African migrants in France and native French women explain differences in CEB between the two groups, which supports adaptation. These multifaceted findings on selection, disruption, and adaptation would be obscured by analyzing destination settings only, thus validating a multisited approach to migrant fertility.
KW - Africa
KW - France
KW - family
KW - fertility
KW - migration
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85122350022&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85122350022&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/01979183211046571
DO - 10.1177/01979183211046571
M3 - Article
C2 - 37461403
AN - SCOPUS:85122350022
SN - 0197-9183
VL - 56
SP - 911
EP - 940
JO - International Migration Review
JF - International Migration Review
IS - 3
ER -