Police-induced confessions: Risk factors and recommendations

Saul M. Kassin, Steven A. Drizin, Thomas Grisso, Gisli H. Gudjonsson, Richard A. Leo, Allison D. Redlich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

329 Scopus citations

Abstract

Recent DNA exonerations have shed light on the problem that people sometimes confess to crimes they did not commit. Drawing on police practices, laws concerning the admissibility of confession evidence, core principles of psychology, and forensic studies involving multiple methodologies, this White Paper summarizes what is known about police-induced confessions. In this review, we identify suspect characteristics (e.g., adolescence; intellectual disability; mental illness; and certain personality traits), interrogation tactics (e.g., excessive interrogation time; presentations of false evidence; and minimization), and the phenomenology of innocence (e.g., the tendency to waive Miranda rights) that influence confessions as well as their effects on judges and juries. This article concludes with a strong recommendation for the mandatory electronic recording of interrogations and considers other possibilities for the reform of interrogation practices and the protection of vulnerable suspect populations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3-38
Number of pages36
JournalLaw and Human Behavior
Volume34
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2010

Keywords

  • Confessions
  • Interrogations
  • Police interviews

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Psychology(all)
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Police-induced confessions: Risk factors and recommendations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this