Abstract
Four nationally representative studies (N = 1,986; three preregistered) find evidence for a bias in how people perceive opposing viewpoints expressed through online discourse. These studies elucidate a political bot bias, where political partisans (vs. their out-party) are more likely to view counter-ideological (vs. ideologically consistent) tweets to be social media bots (vs. humans). Study 1 demonstrates that American Democrats and Republicans are more likely to attribute tweets to bots when those tweets express counter-ideological views. Study 2 demonstrated this bias with actual bot tweets generated by the Russian government and comparable human tweets. Study 3 demonstrated this bias manifests in the context of real recent elections and is associated with markers of political animosity. Study 4 experimentally demonstrates the consequences of bot attribution for perceptions of online political discourse. Our findings document a consistent bias that has implications for political discussion online and political polarization more broadly.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 234-244 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Social Psychological and Personality Science |
Volume | 15 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Mar 2024 |
Keywords
- cognitive bias
- political polarization
- social media bots
- social processes
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Social Psychology
- Clinical Psychology