Political parties and the sociological imagination: Past, present, and future directions

Stephanie L. Mudge, Anthony S. Chen

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The classical sociology of parties was born alongside parties themselves. It explored their dynamic interrelationships with states and society, as well as the tensions inherent in the fact that parties are simultaneously representatives and power seekers. Despite these rich foundations, from the 1960s the sociological approach came to be narrowly identified with a one-dimensional conception of parties, and political sociologists focused their attention elsewhere. This review contributes to efforts that began in the 1990s to reclaim the political party as a full-fledged sociological object. To this end, we track the hourglass-shaped trajectory of the sociology of parties: from broad Marxian and Weberian roots, to narrowing and near-eclipse after the 1960s, to a reemergence that reclaims the breadth of the classical traditions. We conclude by suggesting six lines of inquiry that we believe would be fruitful, emphasizing both classical concerns that deserve more attention and innovative approaches that point in novel directions. ©

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)305-330
Number of pages26
JournalAnnual Review of Sociology
Volume40
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2014

Fingerprint

sociology
present
sociologist
imagination
Society

Keywords

  • Democracy
  • Political parties
  • Political sociology
  • Representation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{6916d68ecab3469eb3aa4531852b8295,
title = "Political parties and the sociological imagination: Past, present, and future directions",
abstract = "The classical sociology of parties was born alongside parties themselves. It explored their dynamic interrelationships with states and society, as well as the tensions inherent in the fact that parties are simultaneously representatives and power seekers. Despite these rich foundations, from the 1960s the sociological approach came to be narrowly identified with a one-dimensional conception of parties, and political sociologists focused their attention elsewhere. This review contributes to efforts that began in the 1990s to reclaim the political party as a full-fledged sociological object. To this end, we track the hourglass-shaped trajectory of the sociology of parties: from broad Marxian and Weberian roots, to narrowing and near-eclipse after the 1960s, to a reemergence that reclaims the breadth of the classical traditions. We conclude by suggesting six lines of inquiry that we believe would be fruitful, emphasizing both classical concerns that deserve more attention and innovative approaches that point in novel directions. {\circledC}",
keywords = "Democracy, Political parties, Political sociology, Representation",
author = "Mudge, {Stephanie L.} and Chen, {Anthony S.}",
year = "2014",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1146/annurev-soc-071312-145632",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "305--330",
journal = "Annual Review of Sociology",
issn = "0360-0572",
publisher = "Annual Reviews Inc.",

}

Political parties and the sociological imagination : Past, present, and future directions. / Mudge, Stephanie L.; Chen, Anthony S.

In: Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 40, 07.2014, p. 305-330.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Political parties and the sociological imagination

T2 - Past, present, and future directions

AU - Mudge, Stephanie L.

AU - Chen, Anthony S.

PY - 2014/7

Y1 - 2014/7

N2 - The classical sociology of parties was born alongside parties themselves. It explored their dynamic interrelationships with states and society, as well as the tensions inherent in the fact that parties are simultaneously representatives and power seekers. Despite these rich foundations, from the 1960s the sociological approach came to be narrowly identified with a one-dimensional conception of parties, and political sociologists focused their attention elsewhere. This review contributes to efforts that began in the 1990s to reclaim the political party as a full-fledged sociological object. To this end, we track the hourglass-shaped trajectory of the sociology of parties: from broad Marxian and Weberian roots, to narrowing and near-eclipse after the 1960s, to a reemergence that reclaims the breadth of the classical traditions. We conclude by suggesting six lines of inquiry that we believe would be fruitful, emphasizing both classical concerns that deserve more attention and innovative approaches that point in novel directions. ©

AB - The classical sociology of parties was born alongside parties themselves. It explored their dynamic interrelationships with states and society, as well as the tensions inherent in the fact that parties are simultaneously representatives and power seekers. Despite these rich foundations, from the 1960s the sociological approach came to be narrowly identified with a one-dimensional conception of parties, and political sociologists focused their attention elsewhere. This review contributes to efforts that began in the 1990s to reclaim the political party as a full-fledged sociological object. To this end, we track the hourglass-shaped trajectory of the sociology of parties: from broad Marxian and Weberian roots, to narrowing and near-eclipse after the 1960s, to a reemergence that reclaims the breadth of the classical traditions. We conclude by suggesting six lines of inquiry that we believe would be fruitful, emphasizing both classical concerns that deserve more attention and innovative approaches that point in novel directions. ©

KW - Democracy

KW - Political parties

KW - Political sociology

KW - Representation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84905224419&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84905224419&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1146/annurev-soc-071312-145632

DO - 10.1146/annurev-soc-071312-145632

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:84905224419

VL - 40

SP - 305

EP - 330

JO - Annual Review of Sociology

JF - Annual Review of Sociology

SN - 0360-0572

ER -