Précis of Philosophizing the Indefensible

Shmuel Nili*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This book asks what distinctive contributions political philosophers might make when reflecting on obvious moral failures in public policy. I defend a particular kind of contribution: I argue that political philosophers can and should craft 'strategic' arguments for public policy reforms, showing how morally urgent reforms can be grounded, for the sake of discussion, even in problematic premises associated with their opponents. The book's opening chapter provides a general defense of this approach, situating it within a broader conception of political philosophy's social responsibilities. Subsequent chapters then apply strategic theorizing to a set of diverse policy issues. These range from the abortion debate and financial regulation in the United States, through controversies surrounding the participation of Arab parties in Israel's political process, to global issues, such as commercial ties with oil-rich dictatorships, and the bearing of such ties on global climate change.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)249-256
Number of pages8
JournalAnalyse und Kritik
Volume46
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2024

Keywords

  • Donald Trump
  • Israeli-Palestinian conflict
  • Netanyahu
  • abortion
  • green energy
  • political rhetoric

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Philosophy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Précis of Philosophizing the Indefensible'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this