Practice-related changes in lumbar loading during rapid voluntary pulls made while standing

Alison Hsin-I Chang*, Wynne A. Lee, James L. Patton

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. To determine if five days of practice on a novel dynamic, multi-joint pulling task resulted in lower magnitudes of lumbar loading or a more consistent relationship between pulling force and lumbar loading. Design. A repeated measures design compared how practice influenced the magnitude of lumbar torque and the correlations between lumbar torque and pulling force.Background. Previous studies suggest that practice can decrease the magnitude of lumbar loading on simple manual material handling tasks, but it is unknown whether practice reduces lumbar loading for more complex tasks. Neither is it known whether the consistency of lumbar loading increases with practice. Methods. Ten healthy adults practiced impulse-like horizontal pulls to targets equaling 20%, 40% and 80% of their estimated maximal dynamic pulling force over 5 days. Movements were unrestrained, other than keeping the feet flat on the ground. We used a four-segment, sagittal plane inverse dynamics model to compute lumbar, hip, knee, and ankle torques on days 1 and 5 from ground reaction forces and moments, pulling forces, and kinematics. Results. An analysis of variance showed significant practice-related changes in lumbar torque at the time of peak pulling force (lumbar torque(peakPF)). The lumbar torque(peakPF) decreased for the 20% pulls, did not change for the 40% pulls, and increased for the 80% pulls. Two subjects showed a significant decrease in lumbar torque(peakPF) for all three force levels. Coefficients of determination between pulling force and lumbar torque (r2(PF,LT): a measure of the consistency of the relationship between these two variables) were significantly higher on day 5 than day 1. Conclusions. Practice on a novel pulling task changed the magnitude of lumbar torques and increased their correlation with pulling force, suggesting that subjects learned strategies that improve motor control of lumbar torques. Relevance. The study showed that the magnitude and consistency of lumbar loading changed spontaneously as subjects practiced a novel multijoint pulling task. Such changes may decrease the risk of low-back injury. Copyright (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)726-734
Number of pages9
JournalClinical Biomechanics
Volume15
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2000

Fingerprint

Torque
Back Injuries
Flatfoot
Biomechanical Phenomena
Ankle
Hip
Knee
Analysis of Variance
Joints

Keywords

  • Biomechanics
  • Learning
  • Low back
  • Lumbar spine
  • Practice
  • Training

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

@article{18ad2cc7a0ae4af892f7787b1fc34937,
title = "Practice-related changes in lumbar loading during rapid voluntary pulls made while standing",
abstract = "Objective. To determine if five days of practice on a novel dynamic, multi-joint pulling task resulted in lower magnitudes of lumbar loading or a more consistent relationship between pulling force and lumbar loading. Design. A repeated measures design compared how practice influenced the magnitude of lumbar torque and the correlations between lumbar torque and pulling force.Background. Previous studies suggest that practice can decrease the magnitude of lumbar loading on simple manual material handling tasks, but it is unknown whether practice reduces lumbar loading for more complex tasks. Neither is it known whether the consistency of lumbar loading increases with practice. Methods. Ten healthy adults practiced impulse-like horizontal pulls to targets equaling 20{\%}, 40{\%} and 80{\%} of their estimated maximal dynamic pulling force over 5 days. Movements were unrestrained, other than keeping the feet flat on the ground. We used a four-segment, sagittal plane inverse dynamics model to compute lumbar, hip, knee, and ankle torques on days 1 and 5 from ground reaction forces and moments, pulling forces, and kinematics. Results. An analysis of variance showed significant practice-related changes in lumbar torque at the time of peak pulling force (lumbar torque(peakPF)). The lumbar torque(peakPF) decreased for the 20{\%} pulls, did not change for the 40{\%} pulls, and increased for the 80{\%} pulls. Two subjects showed a significant decrease in lumbar torque(peakPF) for all three force levels. Coefficients of determination between pulling force and lumbar torque (r2(PF,LT): a measure of the consistency of the relationship between these two variables) were significantly higher on day 5 than day 1. Conclusions. Practice on a novel pulling task changed the magnitude of lumbar torques and increased their correlation with pulling force, suggesting that subjects learned strategies that improve motor control of lumbar torques. Relevance. The study showed that the magnitude and consistency of lumbar loading changed spontaneously as subjects practiced a novel multijoint pulling task. Such changes may decrease the risk of low-back injury. Copyright (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd.",
keywords = "Biomechanics, Learning, Low back, Lumbar spine, Practice, Training",
author = "Chang, {Alison Hsin-I} and Lee, {Wynne A.} and Patton, {James L.}",
year = "2000",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0268-0033(00)00039-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "726--734",
journal = "Clinical Biomechanics",
issn = "0268-0033",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "10",

}

Practice-related changes in lumbar loading during rapid voluntary pulls made while standing. / Chang, Alison Hsin-I; Lee, Wynne A.; Patton, James L.

In: Clinical Biomechanics, Vol. 15, No. 10, 01.12.2000, p. 726-734.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Practice-related changes in lumbar loading during rapid voluntary pulls made while standing

AU - Chang, Alison Hsin-I

AU - Lee, Wynne A.

AU - Patton, James L.

PY - 2000/12/1

Y1 - 2000/12/1

N2 - Objective. To determine if five days of practice on a novel dynamic, multi-joint pulling task resulted in lower magnitudes of lumbar loading or a more consistent relationship between pulling force and lumbar loading. Design. A repeated measures design compared how practice influenced the magnitude of lumbar torque and the correlations between lumbar torque and pulling force.Background. Previous studies suggest that practice can decrease the magnitude of lumbar loading on simple manual material handling tasks, but it is unknown whether practice reduces lumbar loading for more complex tasks. Neither is it known whether the consistency of lumbar loading increases with practice. Methods. Ten healthy adults practiced impulse-like horizontal pulls to targets equaling 20%, 40% and 80% of their estimated maximal dynamic pulling force over 5 days. Movements were unrestrained, other than keeping the feet flat on the ground. We used a four-segment, sagittal plane inverse dynamics model to compute lumbar, hip, knee, and ankle torques on days 1 and 5 from ground reaction forces and moments, pulling forces, and kinematics. Results. An analysis of variance showed significant practice-related changes in lumbar torque at the time of peak pulling force (lumbar torque(peakPF)). The lumbar torque(peakPF) decreased for the 20% pulls, did not change for the 40% pulls, and increased for the 80% pulls. Two subjects showed a significant decrease in lumbar torque(peakPF) for all three force levels. Coefficients of determination between pulling force and lumbar torque (r2(PF,LT): a measure of the consistency of the relationship between these two variables) were significantly higher on day 5 than day 1. Conclusions. Practice on a novel pulling task changed the magnitude of lumbar torques and increased their correlation with pulling force, suggesting that subjects learned strategies that improve motor control of lumbar torques. Relevance. The study showed that the magnitude and consistency of lumbar loading changed spontaneously as subjects practiced a novel multijoint pulling task. Such changes may decrease the risk of low-back injury. Copyright (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd.

AB - Objective. To determine if five days of practice on a novel dynamic, multi-joint pulling task resulted in lower magnitudes of lumbar loading or a more consistent relationship between pulling force and lumbar loading. Design. A repeated measures design compared how practice influenced the magnitude of lumbar torque and the correlations between lumbar torque and pulling force.Background. Previous studies suggest that practice can decrease the magnitude of lumbar loading on simple manual material handling tasks, but it is unknown whether practice reduces lumbar loading for more complex tasks. Neither is it known whether the consistency of lumbar loading increases with practice. Methods. Ten healthy adults practiced impulse-like horizontal pulls to targets equaling 20%, 40% and 80% of their estimated maximal dynamic pulling force over 5 days. Movements were unrestrained, other than keeping the feet flat on the ground. We used a four-segment, sagittal plane inverse dynamics model to compute lumbar, hip, knee, and ankle torques on days 1 and 5 from ground reaction forces and moments, pulling forces, and kinematics. Results. An analysis of variance showed significant practice-related changes in lumbar torque at the time of peak pulling force (lumbar torque(peakPF)). The lumbar torque(peakPF) decreased for the 20% pulls, did not change for the 40% pulls, and increased for the 80% pulls. Two subjects showed a significant decrease in lumbar torque(peakPF) for all three force levels. Coefficients of determination between pulling force and lumbar torque (r2(PF,LT): a measure of the consistency of the relationship between these two variables) were significantly higher on day 5 than day 1. Conclusions. Practice on a novel pulling task changed the magnitude of lumbar torques and increased their correlation with pulling force, suggesting that subjects learned strategies that improve motor control of lumbar torques. Relevance. The study showed that the magnitude and consistency of lumbar loading changed spontaneously as subjects practiced a novel multijoint pulling task. Such changes may decrease the risk of low-back injury. Copyright (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd.

KW - Biomechanics

KW - Learning

KW - Low back

KW - Lumbar spine

KW - Practice

KW - Training

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034578882&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034578882&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0268-0033(00)00039-5

DO - 10.1016/S0268-0033(00)00039-5

M3 - Article

C2 - 11050354

AN - SCOPUS:0034578882

VL - 15

SP - 726

EP - 734

JO - Clinical Biomechanics

JF - Clinical Biomechanics

SN - 0268-0033

IS - 10

ER -