Precluding Nonviolence, Propelling Violence: The Effect of Internal Fragmentation on Movement Protest

Wendy Pearlman

doi:10.1007/s12116-012-9099-2

Precluding Nonviolence, Propelling Violence: The Effect of Internal Fragmentation on Movement Protest

Wendy Pearlman^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Political Science

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

19 Scopus citations

Abstract

Scholars often overlook that an adequate explanation of why a movement uses violent means of protest requires an account of why it does not instead use nonviolent means. This essay argues that while paths to violence are multiple, there is one prevailing path to nonviolent protest-that which opens when a movement is politically cohesive. Cohesion approximates a necessary condition for nonviolent protest because such protest requires coordination and collective restraint. Conversely, fragmentation generates incentives and opportunities that increase the likelihood that protest will become violent. This argument, specified in terms of composite mechanisms and demonstrated by overtime variation in the Palestinian case, critiques the assumption that movements can be treated as unitary actors. It also shifts attention from movements' motivations to their organizational configurations.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	23-46
Number of pages	24
Journal	Studies in Comparative International Development
Volume	47
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-012-9099-2
State	Published - Mar 2012

Funding

Acknowledgments The author is thankful for feedback on this paper gained at the Northwestern University Comparative Historical Social Science Workshop, University of Chicago Comparative Politics Workshop, Harvard University Middle East Politics Workshop, and Northeast Middle East Politics Workshop, among other conferences. She is also grateful for funding support for the research and writing of this article, provided by the United States Institute of Peace, the Palestinian American Research Center, the Harvard University–Hebrew University Graduate Fellowship, and the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs at the John F. Kennedy School of Government.

Keywords

Arab-Israeli conflict
Middle East
Nonviolence
Palestinians
Social movements
Violence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Development
Sociology and Political Science
Political Science and International Relations

Access to Document

10.1007/s12116-012-9099-2

Cite this

@article{da581329d61d48539cbf25363fbd032b,

title = "Precluding Nonviolence, Propelling Violence: The Effect of Internal Fragmentation on Movement Protest",

abstract = "Scholars often overlook that an adequate explanation of why a movement uses violent means of protest requires an account of why it does not instead use nonviolent means. This essay argues that while paths to violence are multiple, there is one prevailing path to nonviolent protest-that which opens when a movement is politically cohesive. Cohesion approximates a necessary condition for nonviolent protest because such protest requires coordination and collective restraint. Conversely, fragmentation generates incentives and opportunities that increase the likelihood that protest will become violent. This argument, specified in terms of composite mechanisms and demonstrated by overtime variation in the Palestinian case, critiques the assumption that movements can be treated as unitary actors. It also shifts attention from movements' motivations to their organizational configurations.",

keywords = "Arab-Israeli conflict, Middle East, Nonviolence, Palestinians, Social movements, Violence",

author = "Wendy Pearlman",

note = "Funding Information: Acknowledgments The author is thankful for feedback on this paper gained at the Northwestern University Comparative Historical Social Science Workshop, University of Chicago Comparative Politics Workshop, Harvard University Middle East Politics Workshop, and Northeast Middle East Politics Workshop, among other conferences. She is also grateful for funding support for the research and writing of this article, provided by the United States Institute of Peace, the Palestinian American Research Center, the Harvard University–Hebrew University Graduate Fellowship, and the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs at the John F. Kennedy School of Government.",

year = "2012",

month = mar,

doi = "10.1007/s12116-012-9099-2",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "47",

pages = "23--46",

journal = "Studies in Comparative International Development",

issn = "0039-3606",

publisher = "Springer New York",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Precluding Nonviolence, Propelling Violence

T2 - The Effect of Internal Fragmentation on Movement Protest

AU - Pearlman, Wendy

N1 - Funding Information: Acknowledgments The author is thankful for feedback on this paper gained at the Northwestern University Comparative Historical Social Science Workshop, University of Chicago Comparative Politics Workshop, Harvard University Middle East Politics Workshop, and Northeast Middle East Politics Workshop, among other conferences. She is also grateful for funding support for the research and writing of this article, provided by the United States Institute of Peace, the Palestinian American Research Center, the Harvard University–Hebrew University Graduate Fellowship, and the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs at the John F. Kennedy School of Government.

PY - 2012/3

Y1 - 2012/3

N2 - Scholars often overlook that an adequate explanation of why a movement uses violent means of protest requires an account of why it does not instead use nonviolent means. This essay argues that while paths to violence are multiple, there is one prevailing path to nonviolent protest-that which opens when a movement is politically cohesive. Cohesion approximates a necessary condition for nonviolent protest because such protest requires coordination and collective restraint. Conversely, fragmentation generates incentives and opportunities that increase the likelihood that protest will become violent. This argument, specified in terms of composite mechanisms and demonstrated by overtime variation in the Palestinian case, critiques the assumption that movements can be treated as unitary actors. It also shifts attention from movements' motivations to their organizational configurations.

AB - Scholars often overlook that an adequate explanation of why a movement uses violent means of protest requires an account of why it does not instead use nonviolent means. This essay argues that while paths to violence are multiple, there is one prevailing path to nonviolent protest-that which opens when a movement is politically cohesive. Cohesion approximates a necessary condition for nonviolent protest because such protest requires coordination and collective restraint. Conversely, fragmentation generates incentives and opportunities that increase the likelihood that protest will become violent. This argument, specified in terms of composite mechanisms and demonstrated by overtime variation in the Palestinian case, critiques the assumption that movements can be treated as unitary actors. It also shifts attention from movements' motivations to their organizational configurations.

KW - Arab-Israeli conflict

KW - Middle East

KW - Nonviolence

KW - Palestinians

KW - Social movements

KW - Violence

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84859629005&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84859629005&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s12116-012-9099-2

DO - 10.1007/s12116-012-9099-2

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84859629005

SN - 0039-3606

VL - 47

SP - 23

EP - 46

JO - Studies in Comparative International Development

JF - Studies in Comparative International Development

IS - 1

ER -

Precluding Nonviolence, Propelling Violence: The Effect of Internal Fragmentation on Movement Protest

Abstract

Funding

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this