TY - JOUR
T1 - Predicting Kidney Discard Using Machine Learning
AU - Barah, Masoud
AU - Mehrotra, Sanjay
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Georg Thieme Verlag. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Background. Despite the kidney supply shortage, 18%-20% of deceased donor kidneys are discarded annually in the United States. In 2018, 3569 kidneys were discarded. Methods. We compared machine learning (ML) techniques to identify kidneys at risk of discard at the time of match run and after biopsy and machine perfusion results become available. The cohort consisted of adult deceased donor kidneys donated between December 4, 2014, and July 1, 2019. The studied ML models included Random Forests (RF), Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost), Neural Networks (NNet), Support Vector Machines (SVM), and K-nearest Neighbors (KNN). In addition, a Logistic Regression (LR) model was fitted and used for comparison with the ML models' performance. Results. RF outperformed other ML models. Of 8036 discarded kidneys in the test dataset, LR correctly classified 3422 kidneys, whereas RF correctly classified 4762 kidneys (area under the receiver operative curve [AUC]: 0.85 versus 0.888, and balanced accuracy: 0.681 versus 0.759). For the kidneys with kidney donor profile index of >85% (6079 total), RF significantly outperformed LR in classifying discard and transplant prediction (AUC: 0.814 versus 0.717, and balanced accuracy: 0.732 versus 0.657). More than 388 kidneys were correctly classified using RF. Including biopsy and machine perfusion variables improved the performance of LR and RF (LR's AUC: 0.888 and balanced accuracy: 0.74 versus RF's AUC: 0.904 and balanced accuracy: 0.775). Conclusions. Kidneys that are at risk of discard can be more accurately identified using ML techniques such as RF.
AB - Background. Despite the kidney supply shortage, 18%-20% of deceased donor kidneys are discarded annually in the United States. In 2018, 3569 kidneys were discarded. Methods. We compared machine learning (ML) techniques to identify kidneys at risk of discard at the time of match run and after biopsy and machine perfusion results become available. The cohort consisted of adult deceased donor kidneys donated between December 4, 2014, and July 1, 2019. The studied ML models included Random Forests (RF), Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost), Neural Networks (NNet), Support Vector Machines (SVM), and K-nearest Neighbors (KNN). In addition, a Logistic Regression (LR) model was fitted and used for comparison with the ML models' performance. Results. RF outperformed other ML models. Of 8036 discarded kidneys in the test dataset, LR correctly classified 3422 kidneys, whereas RF correctly classified 4762 kidneys (area under the receiver operative curve [AUC]: 0.85 versus 0.888, and balanced accuracy: 0.681 versus 0.759). For the kidneys with kidney donor profile index of >85% (6079 total), RF significantly outperformed LR in classifying discard and transplant prediction (AUC: 0.814 versus 0.717, and balanced accuracy: 0.732 versus 0.657). More than 388 kidneys were correctly classified using RF. Including biopsy and machine perfusion variables improved the performance of LR and RF (LR's AUC: 0.888 and balanced accuracy: 0.74 versus RF's AUC: 0.904 and balanced accuracy: 0.775). Conclusions. Kidneys that are at risk of discard can be more accurately identified using ML techniques such as RF.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85113796008&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85113796008&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/TP.0000000000003620
DO - 10.1097/TP.0000000000003620
M3 - Article
C2 - 33534531
AN - SCOPUS:85113796008
SN - 0041-1337
SP - 2054
EP - 2071
JO - Transplantation
JF - Transplantation
ER -