TY - JOUR
T1 - Prediction of Li intercalation voltages in rechargeable battery cathode materials
T2 - Effects of exchange-correlation functional, van der Waals interactions, and Hubbard U
AU - Isaacs, Eric B.
AU - Patel, Shane
AU - Wolverton, Chris
N1 - Funding Information:
We acknowledge support from Toyota Research Institute through the Accelerated Materials Design and Discovery program (development of software tools for automating electronic structure calculations) and the Center for Electrochemical Energy Science (CEES), an Energy Frontier Research Center funded by the US Department of Energy, Office of the Science, Basic Energy Science under Award No. DE-AC02-06CH11357 (voltage calculations). Computational resources were provided by the National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (US Department of Energy Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231) and the Extreme Science and Engineering Discovery Environment (National Science Foundation Contract No. ACI-1548562).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 American Physical Society.
PY - 2020/6
Y1 - 2020/6
N2 - Quantitative predictions of the Li intercalation voltage and of the electronic properties of rechargeable battery cathode materials are a substantial challenge for first-principles theory due to the possibility of (1) strong correlations associated with localized transition metal d electrons and (2) significant van der Waals (vdW) interactions in layered systems, both of which are not accurately captured by standard approximations to density functional theory (DFT). Here, we perform a systematic benchmark of electronic structure methods based on the widely used generalized-gradient approximation of Perdew, Burke, and Ernzerhof (PBE) and the new strongly constrained and appropriately normed (SCAN) meta-generalized-gradient approximation for battery cathode materials. Studying layered LixTiS2, LixNiO2, and LixCoO2, olivine LixFePO4, and spinel LixMn2O4, we compute the voltage, crystal structure, and electronic structure with and without extensions to incorporate onsite Hubbard interactions and vdW interactions. Within pure DFT (i.e., without corrections for onsite Hubbard interactions), SCAN is a significant improvement over PBE for describing cathode materials, decreasing the mean absolute voltage error by more than 50%. Although explicit vdW interactions are not critical and in cases even detrimental when applied in conjunction with SCAN, Hubbard-U corrections are still in general necessary to achieve reasonable agreement with experiment. We show that no single method considered here can accurately describe the voltage and overall structural, electronic, and magnetic properties (i.e., errors no more than 5% for voltage, volume, band gap, and magnetic moments) of battery cathode materials, motivating a strong need for improved electronic structure approaches for such systems.
AB - Quantitative predictions of the Li intercalation voltage and of the electronic properties of rechargeable battery cathode materials are a substantial challenge for first-principles theory due to the possibility of (1) strong correlations associated with localized transition metal d electrons and (2) significant van der Waals (vdW) interactions in layered systems, both of which are not accurately captured by standard approximations to density functional theory (DFT). Here, we perform a systematic benchmark of electronic structure methods based on the widely used generalized-gradient approximation of Perdew, Burke, and Ernzerhof (PBE) and the new strongly constrained and appropriately normed (SCAN) meta-generalized-gradient approximation for battery cathode materials. Studying layered LixTiS2, LixNiO2, and LixCoO2, olivine LixFePO4, and spinel LixMn2O4, we compute the voltage, crystal structure, and electronic structure with and without extensions to incorporate onsite Hubbard interactions and vdW interactions. Within pure DFT (i.e., without corrections for onsite Hubbard interactions), SCAN is a significant improvement over PBE for describing cathode materials, decreasing the mean absolute voltage error by more than 50%. Although explicit vdW interactions are not critical and in cases even detrimental when applied in conjunction with SCAN, Hubbard-U corrections are still in general necessary to achieve reasonable agreement with experiment. We show that no single method considered here can accurately describe the voltage and overall structural, electronic, and magnetic properties (i.e., errors no more than 5% for voltage, volume, band gap, and magnetic moments) of battery cathode materials, motivating a strong need for improved electronic structure approaches for such systems.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85088559608&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85088559608&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.4.065405
DO - 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.4.065405
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85088559608
SN - 2475-9953
VL - 4
JO - Physical Review Materials
JF - Physical Review Materials
IS - 6
M1 - 065405
ER -