Abstract
Objectives To evaluate the extent of variability in functional responses in participants in the Lifestyle Interventions and Independence for Elders (LIFE) study and to identify the relative contributions of intervention adherence, physical activity, and demographic and health characteristics to this variability. Design Secondary analysis. Setting Multicenter institutions. Participants A volunteer sample (N=1635) of sedentary men and women aged 70 to 89 years who were able to walk 400m but had physical limitations, defined as a Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) score of ≤9. Interventions Moderate-intensity physical activity (n=818) consisting of aerobic, resistance, and flexibility exercises performed both center-based (2times/wk) and home-based (3–4times/wk) sessions or health education program (n=817) consisting of weekly to monthly workshops covering relevant health information. Main Outcome Measures Physical function (gait speed over 400m) and lower extremity function (SPPB score) assessed at baseline and 6, 12, and 24 months. Results Greater baseline physical function (gait speed, SPPB score) was negatively associated with change in gait speed (regression coefficient β=−.185; P<.001) and change in SPPB score (β=−.365; P<.001), whereas higher number of steps per day measured by accelerometry was positively associated with change in gait speed (β=.035; P<.001) and change in SPPB score (β=.525; P<.001). Other baseline factors associated with positive change in gait speed and/or SPPB score include younger age (P<.001), lower body mass index (P<.001), and higher self-reported physical activity (P=.002). Conclusions Several demographic and physical activity–related factors were associated with the extent of change in functional outcomes in participants in the LIFE study. These factors should be considered when designing interventions for improving physical function in older adults with limited mobility.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 11-24.e3 |
Journal | Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation |
Volume | 98 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jan 1 2017 |
Funding
Supported by a National Institutes of Health/National Institute on Aging Cooperative Agreement (agreement no. U01 AG22376) and a supplement from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (grant no. 3U01AG022376-05A2S) and sponsored in part by the Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health. Also supported in part by the Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Centers at the University of Florida (grant no. 1 P30 AG028740), Tufts University (grant no. 1P30AG031679), University of Pittsburgh (grant no. P30 AG024827), Wake Forest University (grant no. P30AG021332), and Yale University (grant no. P30AG021342), the National Institutes of Health/National Center for Research Resources Clinical and Translational Science Award at Stanford University (grant no. UL1 RR025744), the Boston Rehabilitation Outcomes Center (grant no. 1R24HD065688-01A1), and the National Institute on Aging (award no. K07AG3587), the Department of Veterans Affairs, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (agreement no. 58-1950-0-014). Any opinions, findings, conclusion, or recommendations expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Department of Agriculture. The article \u201CPredictors of Change in Physical Function in Older Adults in Response to Long-Term, Structured Physical Activity: The LIFE Study\u201D (Layne et al, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2017;98:11-24) was also supported in part by the Yale Training Program in Geriatric Clinical Epidemiology and Aging-Related Research (National Institute on Aging T32AG019134).
Keywords
- Aging
- Exercise
- Individuality
- Rehabilitation
- Resistance training
- Walking
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
- Rehabilitation