Preferences for in-person disclosure: Patients declining telephone disclosure characteristics and outcomes in the multicenter Communication Of GENetic Test Results by Telephone study

Nina Beri*, Linda J. Patrick-Miller, Brian L. Egleston, Michael J. Hall, Susan M. Domchek, Mary B. Daly, Pamela Ganschow, Generosa Grana, Olufunmilayo I. Olopade, Dominique Fetzer, Amanda Brandt, Rachelle Chambers, Dana F. Clark, Andrea Forman, Rikki Gaber, Cassandra Gulden, Janice Horte, Jessica Long, Terra Lucas, Shreshtha MadaanKristin Mattie, Danielle McKenna, Susan Montgomery, Sarah Nielsen, Jacquelyn Powers, Kim Rainey, Christina Rybak, Michelle Savage, Christina Seelaus, Jessica Stoll, Jill E. Stopfer, Xinxin (Shirley) Yao, Angela R. Bradbury

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Scopus citations

Abstract

Telephone disclosure of cancer genetic test results is noninferior to in-person disclosure. However, how patients who prefer in-person communication of results differ from those who agree to telephone disclosure is unclear but important when considering delivery models for genetic medicine. Patients undergoing cancer genetic testing were recruited to a multicenter, randomized, noninferiority trial (NCT01736345) comparing telephone to in-person disclosure of genetic test results. We evaluated preferences for in-person disclosure, factors associated with this preference and outcomes compared to those who agreed to randomization. Among 1178 enrolled patients, 208 (18%) declined randomization, largely given a preference for in-person disclosure. These patients were more likely to be older (P = 0.007) and to have had multigene panel testing (P < 0.001). General anxiety (P = 0.007), state anxiety (P = 0.008), depression (P = 0.011), cancer-specific distress (P = 0.021) and uncertainty (P = 0.03) were higher after pretest counseling. After disclosure of results, they also had higher general anxiety (P = 0.003), depression (P = 0.002) and cancer-specific distress (P = 0.043). While telephone disclosure is a reasonable alternative to in-person disclosure in most patients, some patients have a strong preference for in-person communication. Patient age, distress and complexity of testing are important factors to consider and requests for in-person disclosure should be honored when possible.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)293-301
Number of pages9
JournalClinical genetics
Volume95
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2019

Funding

information National Cancer Institute, Grant/Award Number: R01 CA160847; National Institutes of Health, Grant/Award Number: P30 CA006927This work was supported by the National Cancer Institute (R01 CA160847) and the National Institutes of Health (P30 CA006927). Study concept and design: A.R.B., L.J.P., B.L.E. Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All authors. Drafting of the manuscript: N.B, A.R.B. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors. Statistical Analysis: B.L.E. This work was supported by the National Cancer Institute (R01

Keywords

  • cancer genetic testing
  • genetic counseling
  • in-person disclosure preference
  • result disclosure
  • telephone disclosure

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics
  • Genetics(clinical)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Preferences for in-person disclosure: Patients declining telephone disclosure characteristics and outcomes in the multicenter Communication Of GENetic Test Results by Telephone study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this