TY - JOUR
T1 - Preliminary results of the generation of a shortened quality-of-life assessment for patients with advanced cancer
T2 - The FACIT-Pal-14
AU - Zeng, Liang
AU - Bedard, Gillian
AU - Cella, David
AU - Thavarajah, Nemica
AU - Chen, Emily
AU - Zhang, Liying
AU - Bennett, Margaret
AU - Peckham, Kenneth
AU - De Costa, Sandra
AU - Beaumont, Jennifer L.
AU - Tsao, May
AU - Danjoux, Cyril
AU - Barnes, Elizabeth
AU - Sahgal, Arjun
AU - Chow, Edward
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2014 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2013/5/1
Y1 - 2013/5/1
N2 - Objective: Shortened quality-of-life (QOL) tools are advantageous in palliative care patients. Development of such tools begins with the identification of issues relevant to a population. The purpose of this study was to identify the most important items of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Palliative Care (FACIT-Pal) to create an abbreviated questionnaire for future palliative care trials. Methods: A convenience sample of patients and health care professionals (HCPs) assessed the relevance of each item of the FACIT-Pal and whether they would include the item in a final questionnaire. Patients and HCPs identified their top 10 most important issues and were asked whether items were inappropriate, upsetting, or irrelevant; a shortened questionnaire was generated from this input. Results: Sixty patients and 56 HCPs participated. The median score in the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) of patients was 70, and the majority of HCPs were radiation oncologists. The 46-item questionnaire was shortened to 14 questions, retaining several items from the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) as well as issues pertaining specifically to palliative care patients. Items within the emotional, physical, and functional well-being subscales were retained along with those for various symptoms including constipation, nausea, dyspnea, and sleep. No new content beyond what is covered by the FACIT-Pal was identified consistently by either HCPs or patients. Similarly, no item was consistently rated as being inappropriate, upsetting, or irrelevant in the 14-item questionnaire. Conclusion: The FACIT-Pal-14, a shortened 14-item questionnaire has been generated for the palliative care population. Future studies should complete psychometric validation of this instrument for the assessment of QOL in palliative care patients.
AB - Objective: Shortened quality-of-life (QOL) tools are advantageous in palliative care patients. Development of such tools begins with the identification of issues relevant to a population. The purpose of this study was to identify the most important items of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Palliative Care (FACIT-Pal) to create an abbreviated questionnaire for future palliative care trials. Methods: A convenience sample of patients and health care professionals (HCPs) assessed the relevance of each item of the FACIT-Pal and whether they would include the item in a final questionnaire. Patients and HCPs identified their top 10 most important issues and were asked whether items were inappropriate, upsetting, or irrelevant; a shortened questionnaire was generated from this input. Results: Sixty patients and 56 HCPs participated. The median score in the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) of patients was 70, and the majority of HCPs were radiation oncologists. The 46-item questionnaire was shortened to 14 questions, retaining several items from the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) as well as issues pertaining specifically to palliative care patients. Items within the emotional, physical, and functional well-being subscales were retained along with those for various symptoms including constipation, nausea, dyspnea, and sleep. No new content beyond what is covered by the FACIT-Pal was identified consistently by either HCPs or patients. Similarly, no item was consistently rated as being inappropriate, upsetting, or irrelevant in the 14-item questionnaire. Conclusion: The FACIT-Pal-14, a shortened 14-item questionnaire has been generated for the palliative care population. Future studies should complete psychometric validation of this instrument for the assessment of QOL in palliative care patients.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84877864316&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84877864316&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1089/jpm.2012.0595
DO - 10.1089/jpm.2012.0595
M3 - Article
C2 - 23590181
AN - SCOPUS:84877864316
SN - 1096-6218
VL - 16
SP - 509
EP - 515
JO - Journal of palliative medicine
JF - Journal of palliative medicine
IS - 5
ER -