Preparedness and Mutuality Affect Quality of Life for Patients With Mechanical Circulatory Support and Their Caregivers

Susan Magasi, Sarah Buono, Clyde W Yancy, Ricardo D. Ramirez, Kathleen L Grady

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical and US regulatory guidelines for patients with mechanical circulatory support (MCS) require the identification of a caregiver to assist with MCS care. There is limited understanding of the impact of MCS caregiving on patients and caregivers. The purpose of this study was to examine how living with MCS affects the quality of life (QoL) of patients and their caregivers through the lens of preparedness and mutuality. METHODS AND RESULTS: The sample included 30 MCS patients and their caregivers. Semistructured qualitative interviews about factors contributing to QoL were conducted with patients and caregivers and analyzed using a 2-phase thematic process. Caregiving impacts QoL of MCS patients and their caregivers long term. When there was limited time to engage in decision-making about MCS implantation, people entered MCS caregiving relationships naive to its full demands. Although most people adjusted to the task demands, MCS caregiving had a significant impact, both positive and negative, on interpersonal relationships. We applied the concepts of preparedness and mutuality to help frame the understanding of the emergent themes of forced choice, adjustment, gratitude, relationship change, strain, and burden (both caregiver and patient perceived). Availability of networks of support was identified as a crucial resource. CONCLUSIONS: MCS caregiving affects QoL for both patients and caregivers. Specifically, preparedness, mutuality, and availability of supportive networks influence QoL of MCS patients and their caregivers. Caregiving relationships change over time. Long-term support by the MCS clinical team can help ensure that physical and emotional needs of MCS patients and caregivers are identified and addressed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)e004414
JournalCirculation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Caregivers
Quality of Life
Social Adjustment
Lenses
Decision Making
Guidelines
Interviews

Keywords

  • caregivers
  • decision-making
  • heart failure
  • patients
  • quality of life

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

@article{cf667cd4310b4d129806ba369754d885,
title = "Preparedness and Mutuality Affect Quality of Life for Patients With Mechanical Circulatory Support and Their Caregivers",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Clinical and US regulatory guidelines for patients with mechanical circulatory support (MCS) require the identification of a caregiver to assist with MCS care. There is limited understanding of the impact of MCS caregiving on patients and caregivers. The purpose of this study was to examine how living with MCS affects the quality of life (QoL) of patients and their caregivers through the lens of preparedness and mutuality. METHODS AND RESULTS: The sample included 30 MCS patients and their caregivers. Semistructured qualitative interviews about factors contributing to QoL were conducted with patients and caregivers and analyzed using a 2-phase thematic process. Caregiving impacts QoL of MCS patients and their caregivers long term. When there was limited time to engage in decision-making about MCS implantation, people entered MCS caregiving relationships naive to its full demands. Although most people adjusted to the task demands, MCS caregiving had a significant impact, both positive and negative, on interpersonal relationships. We applied the concepts of preparedness and mutuality to help frame the understanding of the emergent themes of forced choice, adjustment, gratitude, relationship change, strain, and burden (both caregiver and patient perceived). Availability of networks of support was identified as a crucial resource. CONCLUSIONS: MCS caregiving affects QoL for both patients and caregivers. Specifically, preparedness, mutuality, and availability of supportive networks influence QoL of MCS patients and their caregivers. Caregiving relationships change over time. Long-term support by the MCS clinical team can help ensure that physical and emotional needs of MCS patients and caregivers are identified and addressed.",
keywords = "caregivers, decision-making, heart failure, patients, quality of life",
author = "Susan Magasi and Sarah Buono and Yancy, {Clyde W} and Ramirez, {Ricardo D.} and Grady, {Kathleen L}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.004414",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "e004414",
journal = "Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes",
issn = "1941-7713",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

Preparedness and Mutuality Affect Quality of Life for Patients With Mechanical Circulatory Support and Their Caregivers. / Magasi, Susan; Buono, Sarah; Yancy, Clyde W; Ramirez, Ricardo D.; Grady, Kathleen L.

In: Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes, Vol. 12, No. 1, 01.01.2019, p. e004414.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Preparedness and Mutuality Affect Quality of Life for Patients With Mechanical Circulatory Support and Their Caregivers

AU - Magasi, Susan

AU - Buono, Sarah

AU - Yancy, Clyde W

AU - Ramirez, Ricardo D.

AU - Grady, Kathleen L

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: Clinical and US regulatory guidelines for patients with mechanical circulatory support (MCS) require the identification of a caregiver to assist with MCS care. There is limited understanding of the impact of MCS caregiving on patients and caregivers. The purpose of this study was to examine how living with MCS affects the quality of life (QoL) of patients and their caregivers through the lens of preparedness and mutuality. METHODS AND RESULTS: The sample included 30 MCS patients and their caregivers. Semistructured qualitative interviews about factors contributing to QoL were conducted with patients and caregivers and analyzed using a 2-phase thematic process. Caregiving impacts QoL of MCS patients and their caregivers long term. When there was limited time to engage in decision-making about MCS implantation, people entered MCS caregiving relationships naive to its full demands. Although most people adjusted to the task demands, MCS caregiving had a significant impact, both positive and negative, on interpersonal relationships. We applied the concepts of preparedness and mutuality to help frame the understanding of the emergent themes of forced choice, adjustment, gratitude, relationship change, strain, and burden (both caregiver and patient perceived). Availability of networks of support was identified as a crucial resource. CONCLUSIONS: MCS caregiving affects QoL for both patients and caregivers. Specifically, preparedness, mutuality, and availability of supportive networks influence QoL of MCS patients and their caregivers. Caregiving relationships change over time. Long-term support by the MCS clinical team can help ensure that physical and emotional needs of MCS patients and caregivers are identified and addressed.

AB - BACKGROUND: Clinical and US regulatory guidelines for patients with mechanical circulatory support (MCS) require the identification of a caregiver to assist with MCS care. There is limited understanding of the impact of MCS caregiving on patients and caregivers. The purpose of this study was to examine how living with MCS affects the quality of life (QoL) of patients and their caregivers through the lens of preparedness and mutuality. METHODS AND RESULTS: The sample included 30 MCS patients and their caregivers. Semistructured qualitative interviews about factors contributing to QoL were conducted with patients and caregivers and analyzed using a 2-phase thematic process. Caregiving impacts QoL of MCS patients and their caregivers long term. When there was limited time to engage in decision-making about MCS implantation, people entered MCS caregiving relationships naive to its full demands. Although most people adjusted to the task demands, MCS caregiving had a significant impact, both positive and negative, on interpersonal relationships. We applied the concepts of preparedness and mutuality to help frame the understanding of the emergent themes of forced choice, adjustment, gratitude, relationship change, strain, and burden (both caregiver and patient perceived). Availability of networks of support was identified as a crucial resource. CONCLUSIONS: MCS caregiving affects QoL for both patients and caregivers. Specifically, preparedness, mutuality, and availability of supportive networks influence QoL of MCS patients and their caregivers. Caregiving relationships change over time. Long-term support by the MCS clinical team can help ensure that physical and emotional needs of MCS patients and caregivers are identified and addressed.

KW - caregivers

KW - decision-making

KW - heart failure

KW - patients

KW - quality of life

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059886937&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059886937&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.004414

DO - 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.004414

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - e004414

JO - Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes

JF - Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes

SN - 1941-7713

IS - 1

ER -