TY - JOUR
T1 - Preventing tomorrow's sudden cardiac death today. Dissemination of effective therapies for sudden cardiac death prevention
AU - Al-Khatib, Sana M.
AU - Sanders, Gillian D.
AU - Carlson, Mark
AU - Cicic, Aida
AU - Curtis, Anne
AU - Fonarow, Gregg C.
AU - Groeneveld, Peter W.
AU - Hayes, David
AU - Heidenreich, Paul
AU - Mark, Daniel
AU - Peterson, Eric
AU - Prystowsky, Eric N.
AU - Sager, Philip
AU - Salive, Marcel E.
AU - Thomas, Kevin
AU - Yancy, Clyde W.
AU - Zareba, Wojciech
AU - Zipes, Douglas
N1 - Funding Information:
This conference was funded by AstraZeneca (Wilmington, DE), Bayer (Wuppertal, Germany), Boston Scientific (Natick, MA), GE Healthcare (Princeton, NJ), Medtronic (Mounds View, MN), St Jude Medical (Sylmar, CA).
PY - 2008/10
Y1 - 2008/10
N2 - Because the burden of sudden cardiac death (SCD) is substantial, it is important to use all guideline-driven therapies to prevent SCD. Among those therapies is the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). When indicated, ICD use is beneficial and cost-effective. Unfortunately, studies suggest that most patients who have indications for this therapy for primary or secondary prevention of SCD are not receiving it. To explore potential reasons for this underuse and to propose potential facilitators for ICD dissemination, the Duke Center for the Prevention of SCD at the Duke Clinical Research Institute (Durham, NC) organized a think tank meeting of experts on this issue. The meeting took place on December 12 and 13, 2007, and it included representatives of clinical cardiology, cardiac electrophysiology, general internal medicine, economics, health policy, the US Food and Drug Administration, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the Agency for Health care Research and Quality, and the device and pharmaceutical industry. Although the meeting was funded by industry participants, this article summarizing the presentations and discussions that occurred at the meeting presents the expert opinion of the authors.
AB - Because the burden of sudden cardiac death (SCD) is substantial, it is important to use all guideline-driven therapies to prevent SCD. Among those therapies is the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). When indicated, ICD use is beneficial and cost-effective. Unfortunately, studies suggest that most patients who have indications for this therapy for primary or secondary prevention of SCD are not receiving it. To explore potential reasons for this underuse and to propose potential facilitators for ICD dissemination, the Duke Center for the Prevention of SCD at the Duke Clinical Research Institute (Durham, NC) organized a think tank meeting of experts on this issue. The meeting took place on December 12 and 13, 2007, and it included representatives of clinical cardiology, cardiac electrophysiology, general internal medicine, economics, health policy, the US Food and Drug Administration, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the Agency for Health care Research and Quality, and the device and pharmaceutical industry. Although the meeting was funded by industry participants, this article summarizing the presentations and discussions that occurred at the meeting presents the expert opinion of the authors.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=54849176600&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=54849176600&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.05.027
DO - 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.05.027
M3 - Article
C2 - 18926144
AN - SCOPUS:54849176600
SN - 0002-8703
VL - 156
SP - 613
EP - 622
JO - American Heart Journal
JF - American Heart Journal
IS - 4
ER -