TY - JOUR
T1 - Primary dermal melanoma
T2 - A unique subtype of melanoma to be distinguished from cutaneous metastatic melanoma: A clinical, histologic, and gene expression-profiling study
AU - Sidiropoulos, Michael
AU - Obregon, Roxana
AU - Cooper, Chelsea
AU - Sholl, Lauren Meldi
AU - Guitart, Joan
AU - Gerami, Pedram
N1 - Funding Information:
Supported by the Irene D. Pritzker Foundation and partially supported by Castle Biosciences Inc .
Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc.
PY - 2014/12/1
Y1 - 2014/12/1
N2 - Background Primary dermal melanoma (PDM) is a subtype of melanoma confined to the dermis that may be morphologically impossible to distinguish from cutaneous metastatic melanoma (CMM). Objective We sought to better characterize PDM by describing the clinical, histologic, and molecular features of 49 cases of PDM and determine whether a gene expression-profiling test could help distinguish PDM from CMM. Methods We describe 49 cases of PDM and determined whether any clinical or histopathologic features had a statistically significant relationship with outcome. Secondly, we performed a melanoma gene expression-profiling test on a subset of the PDM and CMM cases. Results Overall recurrence was infrequent and seen in 9 of 49 cases. Six patients had locoregional recurrences and 3 patients had distant metastasis. None of the clinical or histologic parameters showed a statistically significant relationship with recurrence. There was a statistically significant association of a class I signature by DecisionDx-Melanoma assay (Castle Biosciences Inc, Friendswood, TX) for PDM whereas CMM were more frequently class II (P value =.023). Limitations The mean follow-up time was 26 months. Conclusions Most conventional staging parameters used for prognosis in cutaneous melanoma have limited applicability to PDM. The melanoma prognostic assay may be a useful tool for distinguishing PDM from CMM.
AB - Background Primary dermal melanoma (PDM) is a subtype of melanoma confined to the dermis that may be morphologically impossible to distinguish from cutaneous metastatic melanoma (CMM). Objective We sought to better characterize PDM by describing the clinical, histologic, and molecular features of 49 cases of PDM and determine whether a gene expression-profiling test could help distinguish PDM from CMM. Methods We describe 49 cases of PDM and determined whether any clinical or histopathologic features had a statistically significant relationship with outcome. Secondly, we performed a melanoma gene expression-profiling test on a subset of the PDM and CMM cases. Results Overall recurrence was infrequent and seen in 9 of 49 cases. Six patients had locoregional recurrences and 3 patients had distant metastasis. None of the clinical or histologic parameters showed a statistically significant relationship with recurrence. There was a statistically significant association of a class I signature by DecisionDx-Melanoma assay (Castle Biosciences Inc, Friendswood, TX) for PDM whereas CMM were more frequently class II (P value =.023). Limitations The mean follow-up time was 26 months. Conclusions Most conventional staging parameters used for prognosis in cutaneous melanoma have limited applicability to PDM. The melanoma prognostic assay may be a useful tool for distinguishing PDM from CMM.
KW - American Joint Committee on Cancer cutaneous metastatic melanoma fluorescence in situ hybridization gene expression profile melanoma primary dermal melanoma
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925225566&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84925225566&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jaad.2014.07.051
DO - 10.1016/j.jaad.2014.07.051
M3 - Article
C2 - 25262174
AN - SCOPUS:84925225566
SN - 0190-9622
VL - 71
SP - 1083
EP - 1092
JO - Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
JF - Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
IS - 6
ER -