TY - JOUR
T1 - Primary treatment options for high-risk/medically inoperable early stage NSCLC patients
AU - Jones, Guy C.
AU - Kehrer, Jason D.
AU - Kahn, Jenna
AU - Koneru, Bobby N.
AU - Narayan, Ram
AU - Thomas, Tarita O.
AU - Camphausen, Kevin
AU - Mehta, Minesh P.
AU - Kaushal, Aradhana
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2015/11
Y1 - 2015/11
N2 - Lung cancer is among the most common cancers worldwide and is the leading cause of cancer death in both men and women. For patients with early stage (American Joint Committee on Cancer T1-2, N0) non-small-cell lung cancer, the current standard of care is lobectomy with systematic lymph node evaluation. Unfortunately, patients with lung cancer often have medical comorbities, which may preclude the option of surgical resection. In such cases, a number of minimally invasive to noninvasive treatment options have gained popularity in the treatment of these high-risk patients. These modalities provide significant advantages, including patient convenience, treatment in an outpatient setting, and acceptable toxicities, including reduced impact on lung function and a modest risk of postprocedure chest wall pain. We provide a comprehensive review of the literature, including reported outcomes, complications, and limitations of sublobar resection with or without intraoperative brachytherapy, radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, percutaneous cryoablation, photodynamic therapy, and stereotactic body radiotherapy.
AB - Lung cancer is among the most common cancers worldwide and is the leading cause of cancer death in both men and women. For patients with early stage (American Joint Committee on Cancer T1-2, N0) non-small-cell lung cancer, the current standard of care is lobectomy with systematic lymph node evaluation. Unfortunately, patients with lung cancer often have medical comorbities, which may preclude the option of surgical resection. In such cases, a number of minimally invasive to noninvasive treatment options have gained popularity in the treatment of these high-risk patients. These modalities provide significant advantages, including patient convenience, treatment in an outpatient setting, and acceptable toxicities, including reduced impact on lung function and a modest risk of postprocedure chest wall pain. We provide a comprehensive review of the literature, including reported outcomes, complications, and limitations of sublobar resection with or without intraoperative brachytherapy, radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, percutaneous cryoablation, photodynamic therapy, and stereotactic body radiotherapy.
KW - Intraoperative brachytherapy
KW - Microwave ablation
KW - Percutaneous cryotherapy
KW - Photodynamic therapy
KW - Radiofrequency ablation
KW - SBRT
KW - Stereotactic body radiotherapy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84944354999&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84944354999&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cllc.2015.04.001
DO - 10.1016/j.cllc.2015.04.001
M3 - Review article
C2 - 26027433
AN - SCOPUS:84944354999
SN - 1525-7304
VL - 16
SP - 413
EP - 430
JO - Clinical Lung Cancer
JF - Clinical Lung Cancer
IS - 6
ER -