TY - JOUR
T1 - Principal Trading Arrangements
T2 - When Are Common Contracts Optimal?
AU - Baldauf, Markus
AU - Frei, Christoph
AU - Mollner, Joshua
N1 - Funding Information:
History: Accepted by Haoxiang Zhu, finance. Funding: M. Baldauf and C. Frei gratefully acknowledge support by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada [Grants IDG 430-2018-00100 and IG 435-2018-0049, respectively]. The authors also acknowledge support from the 2019 SFS Cavalcade Best Paper in Asset Pricing Award. Supplemental Material: The online appendices are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.4022.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright: © 2021 INFORMS
PY - 2022/4
Y1 - 2022/4
N2 - Many financial arrangements reference market prices that are yet to be realized at the time of contracting and consequently susceptible to manipulation. Two of the most common such arrangements are as follows: (i) guaranteed volume-weighted average price (VWAP) contracts, which reference the VWAP prevailing over an execution window, and (ii) market-on-close contracts, which reference the price prevailing at the window’s end. To study such situations, we introduce a stylized model of financial contracting between a client, who wishes to trade a large position, and the client’s dealer. We provide conditions under which guaranteed VWAP contracts are optimal in this principal-agent problem. In contrast, market-on-close contracts generally cannot be optimal. These results explain the use of guaranteed VWAP contracts in practice, question the use of market-on-close contracts, and suggest considerations for the design of financial benchmarks.
AB - Many financial arrangements reference market prices that are yet to be realized at the time of contracting and consequently susceptible to manipulation. Two of the most common such arrangements are as follows: (i) guaranteed volume-weighted average price (VWAP) contracts, which reference the VWAP prevailing over an execution window, and (ii) market-on-close contracts, which reference the price prevailing at the window’s end. To study such situations, we introduce a stylized model of financial contracting between a client, who wishes to trade a large position, and the client’s dealer. We provide conditions under which guaranteed VWAP contracts are optimal in this principal-agent problem. In contrast, market-on-close contracts generally cannot be optimal. These results explain the use of guaranteed VWAP contracts in practice, question the use of market-on-close contracts, and suggest considerations for the design of financial benchmarks.
KW - benchmark manipulation
KW - dealer-client agency conflict
KW - front-running
KW - principal trading
KW - volume-weighted average price (VWAP)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85132873598&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85132873598&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1287/mnsc.2021.4022
DO - 10.1287/mnsc.2021.4022
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85132873598
SN - 0025-1909
VL - 68
SP - 3112
EP - 3128
JO - Management Science
JF - Management Science
IS - 4
ER -