Abstract
Background: This study sought to determine outcomes in patients with severe, asymptomatic aortic stenosis (AS), stratified by treatment recommendation. Methods: Between January 2005 and December 2013, 4,998 patients had severe AS by echocardiography, of whom 308 were identified as asymptomatic by medical record review. Five patients were deemed inoperable, and 38 were lost to follow-up. Of the remaining 265 patients, aortic valve replacement (AVR) was recommended in 104, and watchful waiting (WW) was recommended in 161. Probabilities of undergoing surgery and of death from recommendation date were estimated using a multistate model. Cox regression analysis was used to determine independent risk factors for death. Results: Probability of death at 1 year after recommendation was 5.2% in the WW group and 4.7% in the AVR group. At 2 years after recommendation, survival in the AVR-recommended group was 92.5% versus 83.9% in the WW group (p = 0.044). In the WW group, the probability of dying or undergoing surgery was 43.9% by 2 years. Undergoing surgery was independently associated with higher survival in the AVR-recommended group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.17; p = 0.038) and in the WW group (HR, 0.39; p = 0.044). A higher ejection fraction (HR, 0.58; p < 0.001) was associated with better survival, whereas renal failure (HR, 2.81; p = 0.009) was associated with worse survival. Conclusions: The strategy of early AVR is associated with improved survival in asymptomatic patients.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 74-79 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Annals of Thoracic Surgery |
| Volume | 108 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jul 1 2019 |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Surgery
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Cite this
}
Prognosis of Severe Asymptomatic Aortic Stenosis With and Without Surgery. / Campo, John; Tsoris, Andrea; Kruse, Jane; Karim, Azad; Andrei, Adin-Cristian; Liu, Menghan; Bonow, Robert O; McCarthy, Patrick M; Malaisrie, S Chris.
In: Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol. 108, No. 1, 01.07.2019, p. 74-79.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
TY - JOUR
T1 - Prognosis of Severe Asymptomatic Aortic Stenosis With and Without Surgery
AU - Campo, John
AU - Tsoris, Andrea
AU - Kruse, Jane
AU - Karim, Azad
AU - Andrei, Adin-Cristian
AU - Liu, Menghan
AU - Bonow, Robert O
AU - McCarthy, Patrick M
AU - Malaisrie, S Chris
PY - 2019/7/1
Y1 - 2019/7/1
N2 - Background: This study sought to determine outcomes in patients with severe, asymptomatic aortic stenosis (AS), stratified by treatment recommendation. Methods: Between January 2005 and December 2013, 4,998 patients had severe AS by echocardiography, of whom 308 were identified as asymptomatic by medical record review. Five patients were deemed inoperable, and 38 were lost to follow-up. Of the remaining 265 patients, aortic valve replacement (AVR) was recommended in 104, and watchful waiting (WW) was recommended in 161. Probabilities of undergoing surgery and of death from recommendation date were estimated using a multistate model. Cox regression analysis was used to determine independent risk factors for death. Results: Probability of death at 1 year after recommendation was 5.2% in the WW group and 4.7% in the AVR group. At 2 years after recommendation, survival in the AVR-recommended group was 92.5% versus 83.9% in the WW group (p = 0.044). In the WW group, the probability of dying or undergoing surgery was 43.9% by 2 years. Undergoing surgery was independently associated with higher survival in the AVR-recommended group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.17; p = 0.038) and in the WW group (HR, 0.39; p = 0.044). A higher ejection fraction (HR, 0.58; p < 0.001) was associated with better survival, whereas renal failure (HR, 2.81; p = 0.009) was associated with worse survival. Conclusions: The strategy of early AVR is associated with improved survival in asymptomatic patients.
AB - Background: This study sought to determine outcomes in patients with severe, asymptomatic aortic stenosis (AS), stratified by treatment recommendation. Methods: Between January 2005 and December 2013, 4,998 patients had severe AS by echocardiography, of whom 308 were identified as asymptomatic by medical record review. Five patients were deemed inoperable, and 38 were lost to follow-up. Of the remaining 265 patients, aortic valve replacement (AVR) was recommended in 104, and watchful waiting (WW) was recommended in 161. Probabilities of undergoing surgery and of death from recommendation date were estimated using a multistate model. Cox regression analysis was used to determine independent risk factors for death. Results: Probability of death at 1 year after recommendation was 5.2% in the WW group and 4.7% in the AVR group. At 2 years after recommendation, survival in the AVR-recommended group was 92.5% versus 83.9% in the WW group (p = 0.044). In the WW group, the probability of dying or undergoing surgery was 43.9% by 2 years. Undergoing surgery was independently associated with higher survival in the AVR-recommended group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.17; p = 0.038) and in the WW group (HR, 0.39; p = 0.044). A higher ejection fraction (HR, 0.58; p < 0.001) was associated with better survival, whereas renal failure (HR, 2.81; p = 0.009) was associated with worse survival. Conclusions: The strategy of early AVR is associated with improved survival in asymptomatic patients.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067354434&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067354434&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.01.031
DO - 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.01.031
M3 - Article
VL - 108
SP - 74
EP - 79
JO - Annals of Thoracic Surgery
JF - Annals of Thoracic Surgery
SN - 0003-4975
IS - 1
ER -