TY - JOUR
T1 - Promoting Collaborative Teaching in Clinical Education
AU - Prystowsky, Jay B.
AU - DaRosa, Debra A.
AU - Thompson, Jason A.
PY - 2001
Y1 - 2001
N2 - Background: Although the practice of medicine is increasingly a multidisciplinary effort, clinical teaching of medical students is accomplished primarily within a departmental structure. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to identify subject matter within the clinical curriculum that could serve as focus for multidisciplinary teaching. Methods: A questionnaire was sent to 13 clerkship directors (representing required clerkships) at a large Midwestern medical school in which they were asked to rate a list of 631 patient problems as critical (primary), important (secondary), or "nice to know," relevant to their respective clerkship objectives. Results: All clerkship directors completed the questionnaire. There were 523 items that were considered primary, and over 90% of these items were listed as either primary or secondary in more than 1 clerkship. Twelve topics were considered primary or secondary by at least 5 clerkship directors. Four clerkship directors identified 43 patient problems, and 3 clerkship directors identified 92 topics as primary or secondary clerkship objectives. Conclusions: In this study, listing of patient problems across clerkships demonstrated significant overlap of the clinical curriculum, suggesting multiple opportunities for faculty collaboration in clinical education.
AB - Background: Although the practice of medicine is increasingly a multidisciplinary effort, clinical teaching of medical students is accomplished primarily within a departmental structure. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to identify subject matter within the clinical curriculum that could serve as focus for multidisciplinary teaching. Methods: A questionnaire was sent to 13 clerkship directors (representing required clerkships) at a large Midwestern medical school in which they were asked to rate a list of 631 patient problems as critical (primary), important (secondary), or "nice to know," relevant to their respective clerkship objectives. Results: All clerkship directors completed the questionnaire. There were 523 items that were considered primary, and over 90% of these items were listed as either primary or secondary in more than 1 clerkship. Twelve topics were considered primary or secondary by at least 5 clerkship directors. Four clerkship directors identified 43 patient problems, and 3 clerkship directors identified 92 topics as primary or secondary clerkship objectives. Conclusions: In this study, listing of patient problems across clerkships demonstrated significant overlap of the clinical curriculum, suggesting multiple opportunities for faculty collaboration in clinical education.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035378177&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035378177&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1207/S15328015TLM1303_3
DO - 10.1207/S15328015TLM1303_3
M3 - Article
C2 - 11475657
AN - SCOPUS:0035378177
SN - 1040-1334
VL - 13
SP - 148
EP - 152
JO - Teaching and Learning in Medicine
JF - Teaching and Learning in Medicine
IS - 3
ER -