Abstract
College faculty often struggle with getting their students to read assigned materials. Even if students do read, they may not read closely or critically. Not only does the lack of effective reading undermine understanding, but it also hampers class discussions and engagement. To promote close and critical reading in a required, upper-division International Security Studies course, we offered optional reading guide worksheets as tools to increase students’ reading comprehension and completion. While our reading guides helped students focus on key terms and lesson objectives, flaws in our implementation produced a lack of perceptual value and extrinsic motivation in using the reading guides. In this article, we offer our lessons learned from the use of reading guides, focusing on their form, function, and frequency. These findings equip faculty with useful guidance in how to design and implement effective reading guides across the disciplines.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 14-30 |
Number of pages | 17 |
Journal | Journal of Political Science Education |
Volume | 20 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2024 |
Funding
The authors would like to acknowledge Elizabeth Acorn, Lauren Scharff, and Rachel Whitlark for feedback on prior versions of this manuscript. They would also like to thank the students of the United States Air Force Academy’s Spring 2021 Social Sciences 311, “International Security Studies,” for their participation in this study.
Keywords
- Critical reading
- academic literacy
- higher education
- motivation
- reading guides
- self-regulated learning
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Education
- Sociology and Political Science