Provider dilemmas with relocation in assisted living: Philosophy vs. practice

Donna J. Munroe*, Marylou Guihan

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

Support for increasing tenant frailty in assisted living (AL) is a complex and challenging issue. Philosophically, older persons, families, providers, and policymakers want to avoid unnecessary relocation. However, there is considerable opportunity for inconsistency in practice. We examined provider perspectives related to implementing aging-in-place, using information obtained from an evaluation of a three-year AL demonstration project in Illinois. We found differences in approaches to explicit move-out criteria, the actual application of move-out criteria, and provider willingness to develop flexible service plans. These findings raise questions for consideration in all states confronted with implementing the philosophy and intent of AL.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)19-37
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Aging and Social Policy
Volume17
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2005

Keywords

  • Aging-in-place
  • Assessment
  • Assisted living policy
  • Eligibility
  • Regulation
  • Relocation
  • Service plan

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Demography
  • Gerontology
  • Life-span and Life-course Studies

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Provider dilemmas with relocation in assisted living: Philosophy vs. practice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this