Pseudoprogression after glioma therapy: A comprehensive review

Tim J. Kruser*, Minesh P. Mehta, H. Ian Robins

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

67 Scopus citations

Abstract

Over the last decade, pseudoprogression as a clinically significant entity affecting both glioma patient management and the conduct of clinical trials has been recognized as a significant issue. The authors have summarized the literature relative to the incidence, chronological sequence, therapy-relatedness, impact of O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase methylation status and clinical features of pseudoprogression. Evidence regarding numerous neuroradiologic techniques to differentiate pseudoprogression from tumor recurrence is summarized. The implications of pseudoprogression on prognosis and clinical trial design are substantial, and are reviewed. Relative to this, the overlapping terms pseudoprogression and radiation necrosis are clarified to produce an appropriate basis for future consideration and research regarding this important biological phenomenon.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)389-403
Number of pages15
JournalExpert Review of Neurotherapeutics
Volume13
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2013

Keywords

  • glioblastoma
  • pseudoprogression
  • radiation necrosis
  • temozolomide

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Pharmacology (medical)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Pseudoprogression after glioma therapy: A comprehensive review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this