TY - JOUR
T1 - Psychoendocrine validation of a short measure for assessment of perceived stress management skills in different non-clinical populations
AU - Wirtz, Petra H.
AU - Thomas, Livia
AU - Domes, Gregor
AU - Penedo, Frank J.
AU - Ehlert, Ulrike
AU - Nussbeck, Fridtjof W.
N1 - Funding Information:
Work was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (Grant PP00P1_128565/1 , to PHW) and Chocosuisse (Association of Swiss Chocolate Manufacturers, Grant 2009) , to PHW).
PY - 2013/4
Y1 - 2013/4
N2 - Background: We investigated the psychometric properties of a short questionnaire for combined assessment of different perceived stress management skills in the general population and tested whether scores relate to physiological stress reactivity. Methods: For psychometric evaluation, we determined the factor structure of the questionnaire and investigated its measurement invariance in the participant groups and over time in three different independent samples representing the general population (total N=332). Reliability was tested by estimating test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and item reliabilities. We examined convergent and criterion validity using selected criterion variables. For endocrine validation, 35 healthy non-smoking and medication-free men in a laboratory study and 35 male and female employees in a workplace study underwent an acute standardized psychosocial stress task. We assessed stress management skills and measured salivary cortisol before and several times up to 60. min (workplace study) and 120. min (laboratory study) after stress. Potential confounders were controlled. Results: The factor structure of the questionnaire consists of five scales reflecting acceptably distinct stress management skills such as cognitive strategies, use of social support, relaxation strategies, anger regulation, and perception of bodily tension. This factor structure was stable across participant groups and over time. Internal consistencies, item reliabilities, and test-retest reliabilities met established statistical requirements. Convergent and criterion validity were also established. In both endocrine validation studies, higher stress management skills were independently associated with lower cortisol stress reactivity (p's<.029). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that the questionnaire has good psychometric properties and that it relates to subjective psychological and objective physiological stress indicators. Therefore, the instrument seems a suitable measure for differential assessment of stress management skills in the general population.
AB - Background: We investigated the psychometric properties of a short questionnaire for combined assessment of different perceived stress management skills in the general population and tested whether scores relate to physiological stress reactivity. Methods: For psychometric evaluation, we determined the factor structure of the questionnaire and investigated its measurement invariance in the participant groups and over time in three different independent samples representing the general population (total N=332). Reliability was tested by estimating test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and item reliabilities. We examined convergent and criterion validity using selected criterion variables. For endocrine validation, 35 healthy non-smoking and medication-free men in a laboratory study and 35 male and female employees in a workplace study underwent an acute standardized psychosocial stress task. We assessed stress management skills and measured salivary cortisol before and several times up to 60. min (workplace study) and 120. min (laboratory study) after stress. Potential confounders were controlled. Results: The factor structure of the questionnaire consists of five scales reflecting acceptably distinct stress management skills such as cognitive strategies, use of social support, relaxation strategies, anger regulation, and perception of bodily tension. This factor structure was stable across participant groups and over time. Internal consistencies, item reliabilities, and test-retest reliabilities met established statistical requirements. Convergent and criterion validity were also established. In both endocrine validation studies, higher stress management skills were independently associated with lower cortisol stress reactivity (p's<.029). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that the questionnaire has good psychometric properties and that it relates to subjective psychological and objective physiological stress indicators. Therefore, the instrument seems a suitable measure for differential assessment of stress management skills in the general population.
KW - Cortisol
KW - Questionnaire
KW - Stress management skills
KW - TSST
KW - Validation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875051368&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84875051368&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2012.07.017
DO - 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2012.07.017
M3 - Article
C2 - 22939272
AN - SCOPUS:84875051368
SN - 0306-4530
VL - 38
SP - 572
EP - 586
JO - Psychoneuroendocrinology
JF - Psychoneuroendocrinology
IS - 4
ER -