Psychology is from mars, sexology is from venus

Can they meet on earth?

Melissa A. Farmer, Yitzchak M. Binik*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Mainstream psychologists have not pursued sexology with the enthusiasm aimed at other areas of psychological research. Ambivalence is evident in the ideological marginalization of sexology by mainstream psychology. The authors argue that scientific conflicts between the disciplines in part reflect divergent interpretations of how each discipline approaches the scientific method. By aligning psychology with positivism and sexology with postpositivism, a discussion of cultural, scientific, and normative conflicts between the two disciplines is presented as evidence for these differences in scientific ideology. To address these conflicts, future directions for scientific progress are proposed for sexology and psychology. Specifically, by capitalizing on the strengths of each discipline, collaboration can lead to the validation of sexology as a science and the enhancement of both disciplines.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)46-51
Number of pages6
JournalCanadian Psychology
Volume46
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2005

Fingerprint

Sexology
Venus
Mars
Psychology
Research
Conflict (Psychology)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Farmer, Melissa A. ; Binik, Yitzchak M. / Psychology is from mars, sexology is from venus : Can they meet on earth?. In: Canadian Psychology. 2005 ; Vol. 46, No. 1. pp. 46-51.
@article{4e31fc6b6ac7453dbe64b1d3f78d681e,
title = "Psychology is from mars, sexology is from venus: Can they meet on earth?",
abstract = "Mainstream psychologists have not pursued sexology with the enthusiasm aimed at other areas of psychological research. Ambivalence is evident in the ideological marginalization of sexology by mainstream psychology. The authors argue that scientific conflicts between the disciplines in part reflect divergent interpretations of how each discipline approaches the scientific method. By aligning psychology with positivism and sexology with postpositivism, a discussion of cultural, scientific, and normative conflicts between the two disciplines is presented as evidence for these differences in scientific ideology. To address these conflicts, future directions for scientific progress are proposed for sexology and psychology. Specifically, by capitalizing on the strengths of each discipline, collaboration can lead to the validation of sexology as a science and the enhancement of both disciplines.",
author = "Farmer, {Melissa A.} and Binik, {Yitzchak M.}",
year = "2005",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/h0085824",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "46",
pages = "46--51",
journal = "Canadian Psychology",
issn = "0708-5591",
publisher = "Canadian Psychological Association",
number = "1",

}

Psychology is from mars, sexology is from venus : Can they meet on earth? / Farmer, Melissa A.; Binik, Yitzchak M.

In: Canadian Psychology, Vol. 46, No. 1, 01.01.2005, p. 46-51.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Psychology is from mars, sexology is from venus

T2 - Can they meet on earth?

AU - Farmer, Melissa A.

AU - Binik, Yitzchak M.

PY - 2005/1/1

Y1 - 2005/1/1

N2 - Mainstream psychologists have not pursued sexology with the enthusiasm aimed at other areas of psychological research. Ambivalence is evident in the ideological marginalization of sexology by mainstream psychology. The authors argue that scientific conflicts between the disciplines in part reflect divergent interpretations of how each discipline approaches the scientific method. By aligning psychology with positivism and sexology with postpositivism, a discussion of cultural, scientific, and normative conflicts between the two disciplines is presented as evidence for these differences in scientific ideology. To address these conflicts, future directions for scientific progress are proposed for sexology and psychology. Specifically, by capitalizing on the strengths of each discipline, collaboration can lead to the validation of sexology as a science and the enhancement of both disciplines.

AB - Mainstream psychologists have not pursued sexology with the enthusiasm aimed at other areas of psychological research. Ambivalence is evident in the ideological marginalization of sexology by mainstream psychology. The authors argue that scientific conflicts between the disciplines in part reflect divergent interpretations of how each discipline approaches the scientific method. By aligning psychology with positivism and sexology with postpositivism, a discussion of cultural, scientific, and normative conflicts between the two disciplines is presented as evidence for these differences in scientific ideology. To address these conflicts, future directions for scientific progress are proposed for sexology and psychology. Specifically, by capitalizing on the strengths of each discipline, collaboration can lead to the validation of sexology as a science and the enhancement of both disciplines.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=14944344455&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=14944344455&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/h0085824

DO - 10.1037/h0085824

M3 - Review article

VL - 46

SP - 46

EP - 51

JO - Canadian Psychology

JF - Canadian Psychology

SN - 0708-5591

IS - 1

ER -