TY - JOUR
T1 - Psychosocial Characteristics of Transgender Youth Seeking Gender-Affirming Medical Treatment
T2 - Baseline Findings From the Trans Youth Care Study
AU - Chen, Diane
AU - Abrams, Mere
AU - Clark, Leslie
AU - Ehrensaft, Diane
AU - Tishelman, Amy C.
AU - Chan, Yee Ming
AU - Garofalo, Robert
AU - Olson-Kennedy, Johanna
AU - Rosenthal, Stephen M.
AU - Hidalgo, Marco A.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by R01HD082554 from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD). Study sponsors had no role in study design; collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; writing of the report; or the decision to submit the article for publication.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine
PY - 2021/6
Y1 - 2021/6
N2 - Purpose: This study aimed to characterize two developmental cohorts of transgender and nonbinary youth enrolled in the Trans Youth Care Network Study and describe their gender identity–related milestones and baseline mental health and psychosocial functioning. Methods: Trans Youth Care participants were recruited from four pediatric academic medical centers in the U.S. before initiating medical treatment for gender dysphoria either with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) or gender-affirming hormones (GAH). GnRHa cohort data were collected from youth and a parent; GAH cohort data were collected from youth only. Results: A total of 95 youth were enrolled in the GnRHa cohort. Mean age was 11.22 years (standard deviation = 1.46), and the majority were white (52.6%) and designated male at birth (51.6%). Elevated depression symptoms were endorsed by 28.6% of GnRHa cohort youth, and 22.1% endorsed clinically significant anxiety. Approximately one fourth (23.6%) endorsed lifetime suicidal ideation, with 7.9% reporting a past suicide attempt. A total of 316 youth were enrolled in the GAH cohort. The mean age was 16.0 years (standard deviation = 1.88), and the majority were white (62%) and designated female at birth (64.9%). Elevated depression symptoms were endorsed by 51.3% of the GAH cohort, and 57.3% endorsed clinically significant anxiety. Two-thirds (66.6%) endorsed lifetime suicidal ideation, with 24.6% reporting a past suicide attempt. Life satisfaction was lower among both cohorts compared with population-based norms. Conclusions: GnRHa cohort youth appear to be functioning better from a psychosocial standpoint than GAH cohort youth, pointing to possible benefits of accessing gender-affirming treatment earlier in life.
AB - Purpose: This study aimed to characterize two developmental cohorts of transgender and nonbinary youth enrolled in the Trans Youth Care Network Study and describe their gender identity–related milestones and baseline mental health and psychosocial functioning. Methods: Trans Youth Care participants were recruited from four pediatric academic medical centers in the U.S. before initiating medical treatment for gender dysphoria either with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) or gender-affirming hormones (GAH). GnRHa cohort data were collected from youth and a parent; GAH cohort data were collected from youth only. Results: A total of 95 youth were enrolled in the GnRHa cohort. Mean age was 11.22 years (standard deviation = 1.46), and the majority were white (52.6%) and designated male at birth (51.6%). Elevated depression symptoms were endorsed by 28.6% of GnRHa cohort youth, and 22.1% endorsed clinically significant anxiety. Approximately one fourth (23.6%) endorsed lifetime suicidal ideation, with 7.9% reporting a past suicide attempt. A total of 316 youth were enrolled in the GAH cohort. The mean age was 16.0 years (standard deviation = 1.88), and the majority were white (62%) and designated female at birth (64.9%). Elevated depression symptoms were endorsed by 51.3% of the GAH cohort, and 57.3% endorsed clinically significant anxiety. Two-thirds (66.6%) endorsed lifetime suicidal ideation, with 24.6% reporting a past suicide attempt. Life satisfaction was lower among both cohorts compared with population-based norms. Conclusions: GnRHa cohort youth appear to be functioning better from a psychosocial standpoint than GAH cohort youth, pointing to possible benefits of accessing gender-affirming treatment earlier in life.
KW - Gender diversity
KW - Gender dysphoria
KW - Gender expansive adolescents
KW - Gender-affirming care
KW - Gender-affirming hormones
KW - Pubertal suppression
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85089732388&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85089732388&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.07.033
DO - 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.07.033
M3 - Article
C2 - 32839079
AN - SCOPUS:85089732388
SN - 1054-139X
VL - 68
SP - 1104
EP - 1111
JO - Journal of Adolescent Health
JF - Journal of Adolescent Health
IS - 6
ER -