PTCOG international survey of practice patterns and trends in utilization of proton therapy for breast cancer

J. Isabelle Choi*, Camille Hardy-Abeloos, Alicia Lozano, Alexandra Hanlon, Carlos Vargas, John H. Maduro, Julie Bradley, Birgitte Offersen, Bruce Haffty, Mark Pankuch, Richard Amos, Nalee Kim, Shannon M. MacDonald, Youlia Kirova, Robert W. Mutter

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose/objectives: The indications, techniques, and extent to which proton beam therapy (PBT) is employed for breast cancer are unknown. We seek to determine PBT utilization for breast cancer. Materials/methods: The Particle Therapy Co-Operative Group (PTCOG) Breast Subcommittee developed an IRB-approved 29-question survey and sent it to breast cancer radiation oncologists at all active PBT centers worldwide in June 2023. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize responses, and comparisons by continent were performed using Fisher's exact tests. Results: Of 79 surveys distributed, 28 recipients submitted responses (35 % response rate) representing fifteen U.S., 8 European, and 5 Asian centers (continent response rate 50 %, 38 %, and 18 %, respectively). Overall, 93 % reported treating breast cancer patients with PBT; 13 (50 %) have treated ≥100 breast cancer patients at their center since opening. Most (89 %) have pencil beam scanning technology. Nearly half (46 %) use moderate hypofractionation (15–20 fractions) for regional nodal irradiation and 42 % conventional fractionation (25–30 fractions). More European centers prefer hypofractionation (88 %) vs. Asian (50 %) and U.S. (21 %) centers (p = 0.003). Common patient selection methods were practitioner determination/patient preference (n = 16) and comparative plan evaluation (n = 15). U.S. centers reported the most experience with breast PBT, with 71 % having treated ≥100 breast cancer patients vs. 38 % in Europe and none in Asia (p = 0.001). Of respondent centers, 39 % enrolled ≥75 % of breast PBT patients on a research study. Conclusion: Utilization, patient selection methods, and dose-fractionation approaches for breast cancer PBT vary worldwide. These survey data serve as a benchmark from which successor surveys can provide insight on practice pattern evolution.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number100847
JournalClinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
Volume48
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2024

Funding

Funding: This research was supported in part by NIH / NCI Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Support Grant/Core Grant No. P30-CA008748 , period: 1/1/19\u201312/31/23

Keywords

  • Breast cancer
  • Hypofractionation
  • Particle therapy
  • Patterns of care
  • Proton therapy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'PTCOG international survey of practice patterns and trends in utilization of proton therapy for breast cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this