Punishment

Daṇḍa

Mark McClish*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

In Indic thought, the daṇḍa (“staff”) represented the king’s use of violence for the purpose of governance. His right and obligation as daṇḍadhara (“wielder of the staff”) to punish those deemed deserving of punishment under the law defined the king’s role in the legal system. In this sense, daṇḍa represented the legalization of domination, in which state violence was reckoned as just punishment. But the king was not the only one with a recognized right to punish. This chapter explores how daṇḍa was used to articulate and legitimize relations of domination within the legal imagination of Dharmaśāstra. It asks, in particular, who is conferred the right to punish and how much?.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationThe Oxford History of Hinduism
Subtitle of host publicationHindu Law A New History of Dharmasastra
PublisherOxford University Press
Pages273-282
Number of pages10
ISBN (Electronic)9780198702603
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Punishment
Staff
Domination
Legal System
Governance
Thought
Obligation

Keywords

  • Daṇḍa
  • Jurisdiction
  • Kingship
  • Penology
  • Punishment
  • Violence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities(all)

Cite this

McClish, M. (2018). Punishment: Daṇḍa. In The Oxford History of Hinduism: Hindu Law A New History of Dharmasastra (pp. 273-282). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198702603.003.0022
McClish, Mark. / Punishment : Daṇḍa. The Oxford History of Hinduism: Hindu Law A New History of Dharmasastra. Oxford University Press, 2018. pp. 273-282
@inbook{edbf69d7bc414fae9f318a9648ce8cb2,
title = "Punishment: Daṇḍa",
abstract = "In Indic thought, the daṇḍa (“staff”) represented the king’s use of violence for the purpose of governance. His right and obligation as daṇḍadhara (“wielder of the staff”) to punish those deemed deserving of punishment under the law defined the king’s role in the legal system. In this sense, daṇḍa represented the legalization of domination, in which state violence was reckoned as just punishment. But the king was not the only one with a recognized right to punish. This chapter explores how daṇḍa was used to articulate and legitimize relations of domination within the legal imagination of Dharmaśāstra. It asks, in particular, who is conferred the right to punish and how much?.",
keywords = "Daṇḍa, Jurisdiction, Kingship, Penology, Punishment, Violence",
author = "Mark McClish",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/oso/9780198702603.003.0022",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "273--282",
booktitle = "The Oxford History of Hinduism",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
address = "United States",

}

McClish, M 2018, Punishment: Daṇḍa. in The Oxford History of Hinduism: Hindu Law A New History of Dharmasastra. Oxford University Press, pp. 273-282. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198702603.003.0022

Punishment : Daṇḍa. / McClish, Mark.

The Oxford History of Hinduism: Hindu Law A New History of Dharmasastra. Oxford University Press, 2018. p. 273-282.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Punishment

T2 - Daṇḍa

AU - McClish, Mark

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - In Indic thought, the daṇḍa (“staff”) represented the king’s use of violence for the purpose of governance. His right and obligation as daṇḍadhara (“wielder of the staff”) to punish those deemed deserving of punishment under the law defined the king’s role in the legal system. In this sense, daṇḍa represented the legalization of domination, in which state violence was reckoned as just punishment. But the king was not the only one with a recognized right to punish. This chapter explores how daṇḍa was used to articulate and legitimize relations of domination within the legal imagination of Dharmaśāstra. It asks, in particular, who is conferred the right to punish and how much?.

AB - In Indic thought, the daṇḍa (“staff”) represented the king’s use of violence for the purpose of governance. His right and obligation as daṇḍadhara (“wielder of the staff”) to punish those deemed deserving of punishment under the law defined the king’s role in the legal system. In this sense, daṇḍa represented the legalization of domination, in which state violence was reckoned as just punishment. But the king was not the only one with a recognized right to punish. This chapter explores how daṇḍa was used to articulate and legitimize relations of domination within the legal imagination of Dharmaśāstra. It asks, in particular, who is conferred the right to punish and how much?.

KW - Daṇḍa

KW - Jurisdiction

KW - Kingship

KW - Penology

KW - Punishment

KW - Violence

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049422133&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049422133&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/oso/9780198702603.003.0022

DO - 10.1093/oso/9780198702603.003.0022

M3 - Chapter

SP - 273

EP - 282

BT - The Oxford History of Hinduism

PB - Oxford University Press

ER -

McClish M. Punishment: Daṇḍa. In The Oxford History of Hinduism: Hindu Law A New History of Dharmasastra. Oxford University Press. 2018. p. 273-282 https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198702603.003.0022