Abstract
Typologies are well-established analytic tools in the social sciences. They can be "put to work" in forming concepts, refining measurement, exploring dimensionality, and organizing explanatory claims. Yet some critics, basing their arguments on what they believe are relevant norms of quantitative measurement, consider typologies old-fashioned and unsophisticated. This critique is methodologically unsound, and research based on typologies can and should proceed according to high standards of rigor and careful measurement. These standards are summarized in guidelines for careful work with typologies, and an illustrative inventory of typologies, as well as a brief glossary, are included online.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 217-232 |
Number of pages | 16 |
Journal | Political Research Quarterly |
Volume | 65 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Mar 2012 |
Keywords
- concept formation
- levels of measurement
- measurement
- multimethod research
- qualitative methods
- scale types
- typology
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Sociology and Political Science