Abstract
Background: The decision to initiate second-line treatment in children with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is complex and involves many different factors. Methods: In this prospective, observational, longitudinal cohort study of 120 children from 21 centers, the factors contributing to the decision to start second-line treatments for ITP were captured. At study entry, clinicians were given a curated list of 12 potential reasons the patient required a second-line treatment. Clinicians selected all that applied and ranked the top three reasons. Results: Quality of life (QOL) was the most frequently cited reason for starting a second-line therapy. Clinicians chose it as a reason to treat in 88/120 (73%) patients, as among the top three reasons in 68/120 (57%), and as the top reason in 32/120 (27%). Additional factors ranked as the top reason to start second-line treatment included severity of bleeding (22/120, 18%), frequency of bleeding (19/120, 16%), and severity of thrombocytopenia (18/120, 15%). Patients for whom QOL (p =.006) or sports participation (p =.02) were ranked reasons were more likely to have chronic ITP, whereas those for whom severity (p =.003) or frequency (p =.005) of bleeding were ranked reasons were more likely to have newly diagnosed or persistent ITP. Parental anxiety, though rarely the primary impetus for treatment, was frequently cited (70/120, 58%) as a contributing factor. Conclusion: Perceived QOL is the most frequently selected reason pediatric patients start second-line therapies for ITP. It is critical that studies of treatments for childhood ITP include assessments of their effects on QOL.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Article number | e29023 |
Journal | Pediatric Blood and Cancer |
Volume | 68 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jun 2021 |
Keywords
- bleeding
- children
- immune thrombocytopenia
- quality of life
- treatment
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
- Hematology
- Oncology