Quantification of aortic regurgitation after balloon aortic valvuloplasty using videodensitometric analysis of digital subtraction aortography

Charles J. Davidson, Katherine Kisslo, Robert Burgess, Thomas M. Bashore*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The serial changes in aortic regurgitation (AR) after balloon aortic valvuloplasty have not been quantitatively evaluated. This study assessed the degree of AR by quantitative and qualitative techniques before and immediately after aortic valvuloplasty. Digital subtraction aortography was performed before and after valvuloplasty in 50 patients. The ratio of left ventricular to aortic contrast density during aortography was analyzed by videodensitometric techniques. A time-density curve was obtained by placing a 30 × 30 pixel region of interest over the aortogram and the left ventricular cavity. The ratio of left ventricular to aortic density at peak aortic density defined the videodensitometric ratio. Independent visual interpretation was also assessed and compared to videodensitometric methods. Quantitatively, no significant change in AR could be demonstrated in the mean videodensitometric ratio before or after balloon aortic valvuloplasty (0.33 ± 0.21 vs 0.37 ± 0.25, p = 0.07). Ten (20%) of the patients had a ≥0.10 increase, and 4 (8%) patients a ≥0.10 decrease in the AR ratio. Thus, serial quantitative and qualitative determinations of AR after balloon aortic valvuloplasty confirm that significant increases or decreases in AR severity are unusual after the procedure.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)585-588
Number of pages4
JournalThe American Journal of Cardiology
Volume63
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 1989

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Quantification of aortic regurgitation after balloon aortic valvuloplasty using videodensitometric analysis of digital subtraction aortography'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this