Quantitative approaches for the evaluation of implementation research studies

Justin D. Smith*, Mohamed Hasan

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

22 Scopus citations


Implementation research necessitates a shift from clinical trial methods in both the conduct of the study and in the way that it is evaluated given the focus on the impact of implementation strategies. That is, the methods or techniques to support the adoption and delivery of a clinical or preventive intervention, program, or policy. As strategies target one or more levels within the service delivery system, evaluating their impact needs to follow suit. This article discusses the methods and practices involved in quantitative evaluations of implementation research studies. We focus on evaluation methods that characterize and quantify the overall impacts of an implementation strategy on various outcomes. This article discusses available measurement methods for common quantitative implementation outcomes involved in such an evaluation—adoption, fidelity, implementation cost, reach, and sustainment—and the sources of such data for these metrics using established taxonomies and frameworks. Last, we present an example of a quantitative evaluation from an ongoing randomized rollout implementation trial of the Collaborative Care Model for depression management in a large primary healthcare system.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number112521
JournalPsychiatry Research
StatePublished - Jan 2020


  • Implementation measurement
  • Implementation research
  • Summative evaluation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Biological Psychiatry


Dive into the research topics of 'Quantitative approaches for the evaluation of implementation research studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this