TY - JOUR
T1 - Quantitative assessment of dynamic control of fingertip forces after pollicization
AU - Lightdale-Miric, Nina
AU - Mueske, Nicole M.
AU - Dayanidhi, Sudarshan
AU - Loiselle, Jennifer
AU - Berggren, Jamie
AU - Lawrence, Emily L.
AU - Stevanovic, Milan
AU - Valero-Cuevas, Francisco J.
AU - Wren, Tishya A L
N1 - Funding Information:
We would like to thank Cassie Nguyen for her assistance with data processing. This publication was supported by SC CTSI (NIH/NCRR/NCATS) through grant UL1TR000130 . Research reported in this publication was partially supported by the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases of the National Institutes of Health under Award Numbers R01-0505020 and R01-052345 . The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. F.V.C., S.D., and E.L. were partially supported by grants NIDRR H133E080024 ; NSF EFRI-COPN 0836042 ; NIH AR050520 and NIH AR052345 to F.V.C. S.D. is currently a postdoctoral fellow in the Muscle Physiology Laboratory, University of California, San Diego.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - Dexterity after finger pollicization (reconstruction to thumb) is critical to functional outcomes. While most tests of hand function evaluate a combination of strength, coordination, and motor control, the Strength-Dexterity (S-D) paradigm focuses on the dynamic control of fingertip forces. We evaluated 10 pollicized and 5 non-pollicized hands from 8 participants ages 4-17 years (2 female, 6 male; 10.6. ±. 4.5. years). Participants partially compressed and held an instrumented spring prone to buckling between the thumb and first finger to quantify dynamic control over the direction and magnitude of fingertip forces. They also completed traditional functional tests including grip, lateral pinch, and tripod pinch strength, Box and Blocks, and 9-hole peg test. Six of 10 pollicized hands and all non-pollicized hands had S-D scores comparable to typically developing children. However, dynamical analysis showed that pollicized hands exhibit greater variability in compression force, indicating poorer corrective action. Almost all pollicized hands scored below the normal range for the traditional functional tests. The S-D test Z-scores correlated moderately with Z-scores from the other functional tests (r= 0.54-0.61; p=. 0.02-0.04) but more weakly than amongst the other functional measures (r= 0.58-0.83; p=. 0.0002-0.02), suggesting that the S-D test captures a different domain of function. A higher incidence of radial absence in the hands with poor S-D scores (3/4 vs. 0/6 in hands with normal S-D scores, p=. 0.03) was the only clinical characteristic associated with S-D outcome. Overall, these results suggest that while most pollicized hands can control fingertip forces, the nature of that control is altered.
AB - Dexterity after finger pollicization (reconstruction to thumb) is critical to functional outcomes. While most tests of hand function evaluate a combination of strength, coordination, and motor control, the Strength-Dexterity (S-D) paradigm focuses on the dynamic control of fingertip forces. We evaluated 10 pollicized and 5 non-pollicized hands from 8 participants ages 4-17 years (2 female, 6 male; 10.6. ±. 4.5. years). Participants partially compressed and held an instrumented spring prone to buckling between the thumb and first finger to quantify dynamic control over the direction and magnitude of fingertip forces. They also completed traditional functional tests including grip, lateral pinch, and tripod pinch strength, Box and Blocks, and 9-hole peg test. Six of 10 pollicized hands and all non-pollicized hands had S-D scores comparable to typically developing children. However, dynamical analysis showed that pollicized hands exhibit greater variability in compression force, indicating poorer corrective action. Almost all pollicized hands scored below the normal range for the traditional functional tests. The S-D test Z-scores correlated moderately with Z-scores from the other functional tests (r= 0.54-0.61; p=. 0.02-0.04) but more weakly than amongst the other functional measures (r= 0.58-0.83; p=. 0.0002-0.02), suggesting that the S-D test captures a different domain of function. A higher incidence of radial absence in the hands with poor S-D scores (3/4 vs. 0/6 in hands with normal S-D scores, p=. 0.03) was the only clinical characteristic associated with S-D outcome. Overall, these results suggest that while most pollicized hands can control fingertip forces, the nature of that control is altered.
KW - Dexterity
KW - Hand function
KW - Pollicization
KW - Strength-dexterity
KW - Surgical outcome
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84961287791&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84961287791&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.08.012
DO - 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.08.012
M3 - Article
C2 - 25262333
AN - SCOPUS:84961287791
SN - 0966-6362
VL - 41
SP - 1
EP - 6
JO - Gait and Posture
JF - Gait and Posture
IS - 1
ER -