Racial bias in perceptions of disease and policy

Sophie Trawalter, Nana Bilkisu Habib*, James N. Druckman

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Narratives about Africa as dark, depraved, and diseased justified the exploitation of African land and people. Today, these narratives may still have a hold on people’s fears about disease. We test this in three (pre-COVID-19) experiments (N = 1,803). Across studies, we find that participants report greater worry about a pandemic originating in Africa (vs. elsewhere). In turn, they report greater support for travel bans and for loosening abortion restrictions. We then document these narratives in an archival study of newspaper articles of the 2015–2016 Zika pandemic (N = 1,475). We find that articles were more negative—for example, they included more death-related words—if they mentioned Africa. Finally, we replicate the experimental results within the COVID-19 context, using a representative sample (N = 1,200). Taken together, the studies make clear that reactions to pandemics are biased, and in a way consistent with historical narratives about race and Africa.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)321-337
Number of pages17
JournalGroup Processes and Intergroup Relations
Volume26
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2023

Keywords

  • Disease
  • prejudice
  • public policy
  • racism
  • stereotyping

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Cultural Studies
  • Communication
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Sociology and Political Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Racial bias in perceptions of disease and policy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this