Racial disparities, judge characteristics, and standards of review in sentencing

Max M Schanzenbach*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    8 Scopus citations


    This article considers how judges’ political and racial backgrounds intersect with offender race under the United States Sentencing Guidelines. Using variation in judges’ political affiliation and race at the district level and significant changes to Guidelines enforcement, I find that Democratic appointees are more lenient than Republican appointees when the Guidelines are less binding. Despite these differences, however, racial disparities do not vary by judge political affiliation under either strict or relaxed Guidelines. Moreover, black and Hispanic judges do not sentence differently from their white counterparts. I conclude that racial disparities change little by Guideline enforcement or judicial characteristics.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)27-47
    Number of pages21
    JournalJournal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics
    Issue number1
    StatePublished - Mar 1 2015

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Economics and Econometrics


    Dive into the research topics of 'Racial disparities, judge characteristics, and standards of review in sentencing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this