Railway restructuring and organizational choice: network quality and welfare impacts

David Besanko*, Shana Cui

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Scopus citations


This paper compares alternative ways of structuring competition in a railway system: vertical separation (VS) and horizontal separation (HS). We compare each structure in terms of its impact on network quality, consumer surplus and social welfare. To do so, we use a two-stage game under HS and a three-stage game under VS to derive Nash equilibrium network qualities, consumer surplus and social welfare, respectively. We highlight four distinct incentive effects that shape network quality under each structure, and we point out that, on balance, they tend to favor higher network quality under HS. However, intensity of transport service competition under each system also plays a critical role in shaping consumer surplus and social welfare. The best case for HS occurs when there is a moderate amount of price competition between the vertically integrated systems, while the best case for VS occurs when there is intense price competition between transport operators. Using computational analysis, we show that it is more likely that HS dominates VS on all three performance metrics.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)164-206
Number of pages43
JournalJournal of Regulatory Economics
Issue number2
StatePublished - Oct 1 2016


  • Infrastructure
  • Network quality
  • Railway restructuring

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics


Dive into the research topics of 'Railway restructuring and organizational choice: network quality and welfare impacts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this