Randomized comparison of experts and trainees with nasal and oral fibreoptic intubation in children less than 2 yr of age

N. Jagannathan*, L. Sequera-Ramos, L. Sohn, A. Huang, A. Sawardekar, N. Wasson, A. Miriyala, G. S. De Oliveira

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background We hypothesized that the time to successful fibreoptic tracheal intubation through the nasal route would be faster than the oral route for both experts and trainees in children <2 yr of age. Methods One hundred children, 24 months and under in age, were randomized to an operator (expert or trainee), and route (nasal or oral) for fibreoptic tracheal intubation. Three separate times were then measured: (i) time to first glottic view, (ii) time to carinal view, and (iii) total time to successful tracheal intubation. The number of attempts made, manoeuvres needed to obtain an adequate laryngeal view, and manoeuvres for tracheal tube passage were also recorded. Results Time to successful tracheal intubation was significantly faster for experts than trainees. There was no difference in the time to tracheal intubation between the nasal and oral routes for experts. In trainees, intubation times were shorter for the nasal route - median (inter-quartile range) time (s) to carinal view was 35 (27-63) for the nasal route vs 59 (38-94) for the oral route (P=0.03), and the median time to successful tracheal intubation were 62 (49-122) vs 117 (61-224), P=0.05, for the nasal and oral routes, respectively. For trainees, the oral route required a greater number of airway manoeuvres for adequate laryngeal views and passage of the tracheal tube compared with the nasal route. Conclusions For clinicians with less experience in using paediatric bronchoscopes, fibreoptic tracheal intubation through the nasal route may be a more straightforward process than the oral route in children <2 yr of age. Clinical trial registration NCT02029300 (www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)290-296
Number of pages7
JournalBritish Journal of Anaesthesia
Volume114
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2015

Fingerprint

Nose
Intubation
Bronchoscopes
Tongue
Clinical Trials
Pediatrics

Keywords

  • airway
  • children
  • laryngoscopy fibreoptic
  • larynx

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

@article{ba46a06e9516443ebb25ca55b00ea274,
title = "Randomized comparison of experts and trainees with nasal and oral fibreoptic intubation in children less than 2 yr of age",
abstract = "Background We hypothesized that the time to successful fibreoptic tracheal intubation through the nasal route would be faster than the oral route for both experts and trainees in children <2 yr of age. Methods One hundred children, 24 months and under in age, were randomized to an operator (expert or trainee), and route (nasal or oral) for fibreoptic tracheal intubation. Three separate times were then measured: (i) time to first glottic view, (ii) time to carinal view, and (iii) total time to successful tracheal intubation. The number of attempts made, manoeuvres needed to obtain an adequate laryngeal view, and manoeuvres for tracheal tube passage were also recorded. Results Time to successful tracheal intubation was significantly faster for experts than trainees. There was no difference in the time to tracheal intubation between the nasal and oral routes for experts. In trainees, intubation times were shorter for the nasal route - median (inter-quartile range) time (s) to carinal view was 35 (27-63) for the nasal route vs 59 (38-94) for the oral route (P=0.03), and the median time to successful tracheal intubation were 62 (49-122) vs 117 (61-224), P=0.05, for the nasal and oral routes, respectively. For trainees, the oral route required a greater number of airway manoeuvres for adequate laryngeal views and passage of the tracheal tube compared with the nasal route. Conclusions For clinicians with less experience in using paediatric bronchoscopes, fibreoptic tracheal intubation through the nasal route may be a more straightforward process than the oral route in children <2 yr of age. Clinical trial registration NCT02029300 (www.clinicaltrials.gov).",
keywords = "airway, children, laryngoscopy fibreoptic, larynx",
author = "N. Jagannathan and L. Sequera-Ramos and L. Sohn and A. Huang and A. Sawardekar and N. Wasson and A. Miriyala and {De Oliveira}, {G. S.}",
year = "2015",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/bja/aeu370",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "114",
pages = "290--296",
journal = "British Journal of Anaesthesia",
issn = "0007-0912",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "2",

}

Randomized comparison of experts and trainees with nasal and oral fibreoptic intubation in children less than 2 yr of age. / Jagannathan, N.; Sequera-Ramos, L.; Sohn, L.; Huang, A.; Sawardekar, A.; Wasson, N.; Miriyala, A.; De Oliveira, G. S.

In: British Journal of Anaesthesia, Vol. 114, No. 2, 01.02.2015, p. 290-296.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Randomized comparison of experts and trainees with nasal and oral fibreoptic intubation in children less than 2 yr of age

AU - Jagannathan, N.

AU - Sequera-Ramos, L.

AU - Sohn, L.

AU - Huang, A.

AU - Sawardekar, A.

AU - Wasson, N.

AU - Miriyala, A.

AU - De Oliveira, G. S.

PY - 2015/2/1

Y1 - 2015/2/1

N2 - Background We hypothesized that the time to successful fibreoptic tracheal intubation through the nasal route would be faster than the oral route for both experts and trainees in children <2 yr of age. Methods One hundred children, 24 months and under in age, were randomized to an operator (expert or trainee), and route (nasal or oral) for fibreoptic tracheal intubation. Three separate times were then measured: (i) time to first glottic view, (ii) time to carinal view, and (iii) total time to successful tracheal intubation. The number of attempts made, manoeuvres needed to obtain an adequate laryngeal view, and manoeuvres for tracheal tube passage were also recorded. Results Time to successful tracheal intubation was significantly faster for experts than trainees. There was no difference in the time to tracheal intubation between the nasal and oral routes for experts. In trainees, intubation times were shorter for the nasal route - median (inter-quartile range) time (s) to carinal view was 35 (27-63) for the nasal route vs 59 (38-94) for the oral route (P=0.03), and the median time to successful tracheal intubation were 62 (49-122) vs 117 (61-224), P=0.05, for the nasal and oral routes, respectively. For trainees, the oral route required a greater number of airway manoeuvres for adequate laryngeal views and passage of the tracheal tube compared with the nasal route. Conclusions For clinicians with less experience in using paediatric bronchoscopes, fibreoptic tracheal intubation through the nasal route may be a more straightforward process than the oral route in children <2 yr of age. Clinical trial registration NCT02029300 (www.clinicaltrials.gov).

AB - Background We hypothesized that the time to successful fibreoptic tracheal intubation through the nasal route would be faster than the oral route for both experts and trainees in children <2 yr of age. Methods One hundred children, 24 months and under in age, were randomized to an operator (expert or trainee), and route (nasal or oral) for fibreoptic tracheal intubation. Three separate times were then measured: (i) time to first glottic view, (ii) time to carinal view, and (iii) total time to successful tracheal intubation. The number of attempts made, manoeuvres needed to obtain an adequate laryngeal view, and manoeuvres for tracheal tube passage were also recorded. Results Time to successful tracheal intubation was significantly faster for experts than trainees. There was no difference in the time to tracheal intubation between the nasal and oral routes for experts. In trainees, intubation times were shorter for the nasal route - median (inter-quartile range) time (s) to carinal view was 35 (27-63) for the nasal route vs 59 (38-94) for the oral route (P=0.03), and the median time to successful tracheal intubation were 62 (49-122) vs 117 (61-224), P=0.05, for the nasal and oral routes, respectively. For trainees, the oral route required a greater number of airway manoeuvres for adequate laryngeal views and passage of the tracheal tube compared with the nasal route. Conclusions For clinicians with less experience in using paediatric bronchoscopes, fibreoptic tracheal intubation through the nasal route may be a more straightforward process than the oral route in children <2 yr of age. Clinical trial registration NCT02029300 (www.clinicaltrials.gov).

KW - airway

KW - children

KW - laryngoscopy fibreoptic

KW - larynx

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84922567565&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84922567565&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/bja/aeu370

DO - 10.1093/bja/aeu370

M3 - Article

VL - 114

SP - 290

EP - 296

JO - British Journal of Anaesthesia

JF - British Journal of Anaesthesia

SN - 0007-0912

IS - 2

ER -