Randomized phase II trial of first-line treatment with sorafenib versus interferon alfa-2a in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Bernard Escudier*, Cezary Szczylik, Thomas E. Hutson, Tomasz Demkow, Michael Staehler, Frederic Rolland, Sylvie Negrier, Nicole Laferriere, Urban J. Scheming, David Cella, Sonalee Shah, Ronald M. Bukowski

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

401 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose An open-label, phase II study to evaluate progression-free survival (PFS), overall best response, adverse events (AEs), and patient-reported outcomes with sorafenib versus interferon alfa-2a (IFN-α-2a) in patients with untreated, advanced renal cancer. Patients and Methods A total of 189 patients were randomly assigned to oral sorafenib 400 mg twice daily or to subcutaneous IFN-α-2a 9 million U three times weekly (period 1). Sorafenib patients who progressed were dose-escalated to 600 mg twice daily; IFN-α-2a patients who progressed were switched to sorafenib 400 mg twice daily (period 2). Results In period 1 PFS was similar for sorafenib-treated (n = 97; 5.7 months) and IFN-α-2a-treated patients (n = 92; 5.6 months); more sorafenib-treated patients had tumor shrinkage (68.2% v 39.0%). Common drug-related AEs (Grades ≥ 3) for sorafenib were hand-foot skin reaction (11.3%), diarrhea (6.2%), and rash/desquamation (6.2%); for IFN-α-2a, these were fatigue (10.0%), nausea (3.3%), flu-like syndrome (2.2%), and anorexia (2.2%). Sorafenib-treated patients reported fewer symptoms, better quality of life (QOL), and greater treatment satisfaction. In period 2, 41.9% of patients who received sorafenib 600 mg twice daily (n = 43) experienced tumor reduction (median PFS, 3.6 months). After the switch to sorafenib 400 mg twice daily, tumors were reduced in 76.2% of 50 patients (median PFS, 5.3 months). AEs were mostly grade 1 to 2; no increase in AEs of grades ≥ 3 occurred after sorafenib dose escalation. Conclusion In this study, sorafenib resulted in similar PFS as IFN-α-2a in patients with untreated RCC. However, sorafenib-treated patients experienced greater rates of tumor size reduction, better QOL, and improved tolerability. Both dose escalation of sorafenib after progression and a switch to sorafenib after progression on IFN-α-2a resulted in clinical benefit.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1280-1289
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Clinical Oncology
Volume27
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 10 2009

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Randomized phase II trial of first-line treatment with sorafenib versus interferon alfa-2a in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Escudier, B., Szczylik, C., Hutson, T. E., Demkow, T., Staehler, M., Rolland, F., Negrier, S., Laferriere, N., Scheming, U. J., Cella, D., Shah, S., & Bukowski, R. M. (2009). Randomized phase II trial of first-line treatment with sorafenib versus interferon alfa-2a in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 27(8), 1280-1289. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2008.19.3342