Randomized phase IIB trial of the lignan secoisolariciresinol diglucoside in premenopausal women at increased risk for development of breast cancer

Carol J. Fabian, Seema A. Khan, Judy E. Garber, William C. Dooley, Lisa D. Yee, Jennifer R. Klemp, Jennifer L. Nydegger, Kandy R. Powers, Amy L. Kreutzjans, Carola M. Zalles, Trina Metheny, Teresa A. Phillips, Jinxiang Hu, Devin C. Koestler, Prabhakar Chalise, Nanda Kumar Yellapu, Cheryl Jernigan, Brian K. Petroff, Stephen D. Hursting, Bruce F. Kimler*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

20 Scopus citations

Abstract

We conducted a multiinstitutional, placebo-controlled phase IIB trial of the lignan secoisolariciresinol diglucoside (SDG) found in flaxseed. Benign breast tissue was acquired by random periareolar fine needle aspiration (RPFNA) from premenopausal women at increased risk for breast cancer. Those with hyperplasia and ≥2% Ki-67 positive cells were eligible for randomization 2:1 to 50 mg SDG/day (Brevail) versus placebo for 12 months with repeat bio-specimen acquisition. The primary endpoint was difference in change in Ki-67 between randomization groups. A total of 180 women were randomized, with 152 ultimately evaluable for the primary endpoint. Median baseline Ki-67 was 4.1% with no difference between arms. Median Ki-67 change was -1.8% in the SDG arm (P ¼ 0.001) and -1.2% for placebo (P ¼ 0.034); with no significant difference between arms. As menstrual cycle phase affects proliferation, secondary analysis was performed for 117 women who by progesterone levels were in the same phase of the menstrual cycle at baseline and off-study tissue sampling. The significant Ki-67 decrease persisted for SDG (median ¼ -2.2%; P ¼ 0.002) but not placebo (median ¼ -1.0%). qRT-PCR was performed on 77 pairs of tissue specimens. Twenty-two had significant ERa gene expression changes (<0.5 or >2.0) with 7 of 10 increases in placebo and 10 of 12 decreases for SDG (P ¼ 0.028), and a difference between arms (P ¼ 0.017). Adverse event incidence was similar in both groups, with no evidence that 50 mg/day SDG is harmful. Although the proliferation biomarker analysis showed no difference between the treatment group and the placebo, the trial demonstrated use of SDG is tolerable and safe.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)623-634
Number of pages12
JournalCancer Prevention Research
Volume13
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2020

Funding

The authors thank Lignan Research, Inc., which provided the study agent. This study was supported in part by a Susan G. Komen Promise Grant (KG101039) partially funded by Zumba Fitness, LLC, a Susan G. Komen Research Grant (SAC110051), and grants from the Breast Cancer Research Foundation (BCRF-17-049 and BCRF-18-049). This project utilized the KUMC Biostatistics & Informatics Shared Resource, which was supported by NCI Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA168524. C.J. Fabian reports receiving grants from Komen for the Cure, nonfinancial support from Lignan Research Inc., and grants from Breast Cancer Research Foundation during the conduct of the study. W.C. Dooley reports receiving other support from Shaga Medical LLC outside the submitted work; in addition, W.C. Dooley has a patent to Breast Microedoscope for biopsy pending. J.R. Klemp reports receiving grants and personal fees from Pfizer, personal fees from AstraZeneca, and personal fees from Novartis outside the submitted work. C. Jernigan reports receiving personal fees from University of Kansas Cancer Center outside the submitted work. B.F. Kimler reports grants from Susan G. Komen, grants from Breast Cancer Research Foundation, and nonfinancial support from Lignan Research, Inc., during the conduct of the study. No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed by the other authors.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Randomized phase IIB trial of the lignan secoisolariciresinol diglucoside in premenopausal women at increased risk for development of breast cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this