TY - JOUR
T1 - Rates and risk factors for anastomotic leak following blunt trauma-associated bucket handle intestinal injuries
T2 - A multicenter study
AU - Grossman, Holly
AU - Dhanasekara, Chathurka Samudani
AU - Shrestha, Kripa
AU - Marschke, Brianna
AU - Morris, Erin
AU - Richmond, Robyn
AU - Ko, Ara
AU - Tennakoon, Lakshika
AU - Campion, Eric M.
AU - Wood, Frank C.
AU - Brandt, Maggie
AU - Ng, Grace
AU - Regner, Justin L.
AU - Keith, Stacey L.
AU - Mcnutt, Michelle K.
AU - Kregel, Heather
AU - Gandhi, Rajesh R.
AU - Schroeppel, Thomas J.
AU - Margulies, Daniel R.
AU - Hashim, Yassar M.
AU - Herrold, Joseph
AU - Goetz, Mallory
AU - Simpson, Le Rone
AU - Doan, Xuan Lan
AU - Dissanaike, Sharmila
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023.
PY - 2023/11/22
Y1 - 2023/11/22
N2 - Objectives The risk factors for anastomotic leak (AL) after resection and primary anastomosis for traumatic bucket handle injury (BHI) have not been previously defined. This multicenter study was conducted to address this knowledge gap. Methods This is a multicenter retrospective study on small intestine and colonic BHIs from blunt trauma between 2010 and 2021. Baseline patient characteristics, risk factors, presence of shock and transfusion, operative details, and clinical outcomes were compared using R. Results Data on 395 subjects were submitted by 12 trauma centers, of whom 33 (8.1%) patients developed AL. Baseline details were similar, except for a higher proportion of patients in the AL group who had medical comorbidities such as diabetes, hypertension, and obesity (60.6% vs. 37.3%, p=0.015). AL had higher rates of surgical site infections (13.4% vs. 5.3%, p=0.004) and organ space infections (65.2% vs. 11.7%, p<0.001), along with higher readmission and reoperation rates (48.4% vs. 9.1%, p<0.001, and 39.4% vs. 11.6%, p<0.001, respectively). There was no difference in intensive care unit length of stay or mortality (p>0.05). More patients with AL were discharged with an ostomy (69.7% vs. 7.3%, p<0.001), and the mean duration until ostomy reversal was 5.85±3 months (range 2-12.4 months). The risk of AL significantly increased when the initial operation was a damage control procedure, after adjusting for age, sex, injury severity, presence of one or more comorbidities, shock, transfusion of >6 units of packed red blood cells, and site of injury (adjusted RR=2.32 (1.13, 5.17)), none of which were independent risk factors in themselves. Conclusion Damage control surgery performed as the initial operation appears to double the risk of AL after intestinal BHI, even after controlling for other markers of injury severity. Level of evidence III.
AB - Objectives The risk factors for anastomotic leak (AL) after resection and primary anastomosis for traumatic bucket handle injury (BHI) have not been previously defined. This multicenter study was conducted to address this knowledge gap. Methods This is a multicenter retrospective study on small intestine and colonic BHIs from blunt trauma between 2010 and 2021. Baseline patient characteristics, risk factors, presence of shock and transfusion, operative details, and clinical outcomes were compared using R. Results Data on 395 subjects were submitted by 12 trauma centers, of whom 33 (8.1%) patients developed AL. Baseline details were similar, except for a higher proportion of patients in the AL group who had medical comorbidities such as diabetes, hypertension, and obesity (60.6% vs. 37.3%, p=0.015). AL had higher rates of surgical site infections (13.4% vs. 5.3%, p=0.004) and organ space infections (65.2% vs. 11.7%, p<0.001), along with higher readmission and reoperation rates (48.4% vs. 9.1%, p<0.001, and 39.4% vs. 11.6%, p<0.001, respectively). There was no difference in intensive care unit length of stay or mortality (p>0.05). More patients with AL were discharged with an ostomy (69.7% vs. 7.3%, p<0.001), and the mean duration until ostomy reversal was 5.85±3 months (range 2-12.4 months). The risk of AL significantly increased when the initial operation was a damage control procedure, after adjusting for age, sex, injury severity, presence of one or more comorbidities, shock, transfusion of >6 units of packed red blood cells, and site of injury (adjusted RR=2.32 (1.13, 5.17)), none of which were independent risk factors in themselves. Conclusion Damage control surgery performed as the initial operation appears to double the risk of AL after intestinal BHI, even after controlling for other markers of injury severity. Level of evidence III.
KW - Intestine, Small
KW - Ischemia
KW - abdominal injuries
KW - colon
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85178438214&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85178438214&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/tsaco-2023-001178
DO - 10.1136/tsaco-2023-001178
M3 - Article
C2 - 38020867
AN - SCOPUS:85178438214
SN - 2397-5776
VL - 8
JO - Trauma Surgery and Acute Care Open
JF - Trauma Surgery and Acute Care Open
IS - 1
M1 - e001178
ER -