TY - JOUR
T1 - Real-time 3D echocardiographic quantification of left atrial volume
T2 - Multicenter study for validation with CMR
AU - Mor-Avi, Victor
AU - Yodwut, Chattanong
AU - Jenkins, Carly
AU - Khl, Harald
AU - Nesser, Hans Joachim
AU - Marwick, Thomas H.
AU - Franke, Andreas
AU - Weinert, Lynn
AU - Niel, Johannes
AU - Steringer-Mascherbauer, Regina
AU - Freed, Benjamin H.
AU - Sugeng, Lissa
AU - Lang, Roberto M.
N1 - Funding Information:
Each of the 4 participating sites received a research grant from Philips Healthcare . Dr. Yodwut received a fellowship from the Department of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose. Sherif Nagueh, MD, served as Guest Editor for this paper.
PY - 2012/8
Y1 - 2012/8
N2 - We studied in a multicenter setting the accuracy and reproducibility of 3-dimensional echocardiography (3DE)derived measurements of left atrial volume (LAV) using new, dedicated volumetric software, side by side with 2-dimensional echocardiography (2DE), using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging as a reference. Increased LAV is associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Although LAV measurements are routinely performed using 2DE, this methodology is limited because it is view dependent and relies on geometric assumptions regarding left atrial shape. Real-time 3DE is free of these limitations and accordingly is an attractive alternative for the evaluation of LAV. However, few studies have validated 3DE-derived LAV measurements against an accepted independent reference standard, such as CMR imaging. We studied 92 patients with a wide range of LAV who underwent CMR (1.5-T) and echocardiographic imaging on the same day. Images were analyzed to obtain maximal and minimal LAV: CMR images using standard commercial tools, 2DE images using a biplane area-length technique, and 3DE images using Tomtec LA Function software. Intertechnique comparisons included linear regression and Bland-Altman analyses. Reproducibility of all 3 techniques was assessed by calculating the percentage of absolute differences in blinded repeated measurements. Kappa statistics were used to compare 2DE and 3DE classification of normal/enlarged against the CMR reference. 3DE-derived LAV values showed higher correlation with CMR than 2DE measurements (r = 0.93 vs. r = 0.74 for maximal LAV; r = 0.88 vs. r = 0.82 for minimal LAV). Although 2DE underestimated maximal LAV by 31 ± 25 ml and minimal LAV by 16 ± 32 ml, 3DE resulted in a minimal bias of -1 ± 14 ml for maximal LAV and 0 ± 21 ml for minimal LAV. Interobserver and intraobserver variability of 2DE and 3DE measurements of maximal LAV were similar (7% to 12%) and approximately 2 times higher than CMR (4% to 5%). 3DE classified enlarged atria more accurately than 2DE (kappa: 0.88 vs. 0.71). Compared with CMR reference, 3DE-derived LAV measurements are more accurate than 2DE-based analysis, resulting in fewer patients with undetected atrial enlargement.
AB - We studied in a multicenter setting the accuracy and reproducibility of 3-dimensional echocardiography (3DE)derived measurements of left atrial volume (LAV) using new, dedicated volumetric software, side by side with 2-dimensional echocardiography (2DE), using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging as a reference. Increased LAV is associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Although LAV measurements are routinely performed using 2DE, this methodology is limited because it is view dependent and relies on geometric assumptions regarding left atrial shape. Real-time 3DE is free of these limitations and accordingly is an attractive alternative for the evaluation of LAV. However, few studies have validated 3DE-derived LAV measurements against an accepted independent reference standard, such as CMR imaging. We studied 92 patients with a wide range of LAV who underwent CMR (1.5-T) and echocardiographic imaging on the same day. Images were analyzed to obtain maximal and minimal LAV: CMR images using standard commercial tools, 2DE images using a biplane area-length technique, and 3DE images using Tomtec LA Function software. Intertechnique comparisons included linear regression and Bland-Altman analyses. Reproducibility of all 3 techniques was assessed by calculating the percentage of absolute differences in blinded repeated measurements. Kappa statistics were used to compare 2DE and 3DE classification of normal/enlarged against the CMR reference. 3DE-derived LAV values showed higher correlation with CMR than 2DE measurements (r = 0.93 vs. r = 0.74 for maximal LAV; r = 0.88 vs. r = 0.82 for minimal LAV). Although 2DE underestimated maximal LAV by 31 ± 25 ml and minimal LAV by 16 ± 32 ml, 3DE resulted in a minimal bias of -1 ± 14 ml for maximal LAV and 0 ± 21 ml for minimal LAV. Interobserver and intraobserver variability of 2DE and 3DE measurements of maximal LAV were similar (7% to 12%) and approximately 2 times higher than CMR (4% to 5%). 3DE classified enlarged atria more accurately than 2DE (kappa: 0.88 vs. 0.71). Compared with CMR reference, 3DE-derived LAV measurements are more accurate than 2DE-based analysis, resulting in fewer patients with undetected atrial enlargement.
KW - 2-dimensional echocardiography
KW - 2DE
KW - 3-dimensional echocardiography
KW - 3DE
KW - CMR
KW - LA
KW - LAV
KW - LAVi
KW - LV
KW - cardiac magnetic resonance
KW - left atrial
KW - left atrial volume
KW - left atrial volume index
KW - left ventricular
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84865093929&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84865093929&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.05.011
DO - 10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.05.011
M3 - Article
C2 - 22897989
AN - SCOPUS:84865093929
SN - 1936-878X
VL - 5
SP - 769
EP - 777
JO - JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging
JF - JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging
IS - 8
ER -