Reasonable patient care under uncertainty

Charles F. Manski*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Scopus citations

Abstract

This paper discusses how limited ability to predict illness and treatment response may affect the welfare achieved in patient care. The discussion covers both decentralized clinical decision making and care that adheres to clinical practice guidelines. I explain why predictive ability has been limited, calling attention to questionable methodological practices in the research that supports evidence-based medicine. I summarize research on identification whose objective is to yield credible prediction of patient outcomes. Recognizing that uncertainty will continue to afflict medical decision making, I apply basic decision theory to suggest reasonable decision criteria with well-understood welfare properties. Previous research on medical decision making has largely embraced Bayesian decision theory. I summarize research studying the minimax-regret criterion, which seeks uniformly near-optimal decisions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1397-1421
Number of pages25
JournalHealth Economics (United Kingdom)
Volume27
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2018

Keywords

  • clinical guidelines
  • clinical judgment
  • evidence-based medicine
  • identification problems
  • personalized patient care
  • risk assessment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reasonable patient care under uncertainty'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this