Reasons for reasons

Baron Reed*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Hilary Kornblith explores the prospects for reasons eliminationism, the view that reasons ought not to be regarded as being of central importance in epistemology. I reply by conceding that reasons may not be necessary for knowledge, in at least some cases, but I argue that they are nevertheless vitally important in epistemology more broadly. Their importance stems from being necessary, not for knowledge but for us, given that we are social agents with practical concerns. In that sense, we have (social and practical) reasons for (having a practice of giving and receiving epistemic) reasons.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)241-247
Number of pages7
JournalEpisteme
Volume12
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • History and Philosophy of Science

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Reasons for reasons'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this