Recommendations for reporting mastery education research in medicine (ReMERM)

Elaine R. Cohen*, William C. Mcgaghie, Diane B. Wayne, Matthew Lineberry, Rachel Yudkowsky, Jeffrey H. Barsuk

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Guidelines for reporting several types of medical studies have been described in the literature. However, there are no current guidelines to report studies on mastery learning curriculum development and trainee evaluation in medical education. Such guidelines will be important because medical education is moving toward a competency-based model. The authors sought to define standards for the evaluation of mastery learning curricula using previously published guidelines in related fields and expert review. The authors reviewed previously published guidelines from clinical medicine, medical education, and the social sciences. Six authors with expertise in mastery learning curricula, performance assessment, and medical education compiled and reached agreement about a list of guidelines. The authors later circulated the list to 12 other experts and made revisions. A final list of guidelines was established and received group consensus. The Reporting Mastery Education Research in Medicine (ReMERM) guidelines have 22 categories with 38 items considered to be imperative for reporting a mastery learning research study. Details about each item, with a specific focus on those unique to mastery learning, are discussed. The ReMERM guidelines highlight the importance of developing rigorous curricula that embody reliable measures which yield valid decisions about achievement among medical learners. These guidelines should improve the quality of reporting and help educators, authors, peer reviewers, journal editors, and readers to better understand and evaluate mastery learning research. With this shift to competency-based medical education, the ReMERM guidelines should help meet medical educators' needs to achieve these new goals.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1509-1514
Number of pages6
JournalAcademic Medicine
Volume90
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2015

Fingerprint

medicine
education
learning
curriculum
expert
educator
performance assessment
curriculum development
evaluation
trainee
expertise
social science
editor
Group

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

Cohen, Elaine R. ; Mcgaghie, William C. ; Wayne, Diane B. ; Lineberry, Matthew ; Yudkowsky, Rachel ; Barsuk, Jeffrey H. / Recommendations for reporting mastery education research in medicine (ReMERM). In: Academic Medicine. 2015 ; Vol. 90, No. 11. pp. 1509-1514.
@article{6cbcb7fd98ea4c7e8dd930f21d3255f1,
title = "Recommendations for reporting mastery education research in medicine (ReMERM)",
abstract = "Guidelines for reporting several types of medical studies have been described in the literature. However, there are no current guidelines to report studies on mastery learning curriculum development and trainee evaluation in medical education. Such guidelines will be important because medical education is moving toward a competency-based model. The authors sought to define standards for the evaluation of mastery learning curricula using previously published guidelines in related fields and expert review. The authors reviewed previously published guidelines from clinical medicine, medical education, and the social sciences. Six authors with expertise in mastery learning curricula, performance assessment, and medical education compiled and reached agreement about a list of guidelines. The authors later circulated the list to 12 other experts and made revisions. A final list of guidelines was established and received group consensus. The Reporting Mastery Education Research in Medicine (ReMERM) guidelines have 22 categories with 38 items considered to be imperative for reporting a mastery learning research study. Details about each item, with a specific focus on those unique to mastery learning, are discussed. The ReMERM guidelines highlight the importance of developing rigorous curricula that embody reliable measures which yield valid decisions about achievement among medical learners. These guidelines should improve the quality of reporting and help educators, authors, peer reviewers, journal editors, and readers to better understand and evaluate mastery learning research. With this shift to competency-based medical education, the ReMERM guidelines should help meet medical educators' needs to achieve these new goals.",
author = "Cohen, {Elaine R.} and Mcgaghie, {William C.} and Wayne, {Diane B.} and Matthew Lineberry and Rachel Yudkowsky and Barsuk, {Jeffrey H.}",
year = "2015",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/ACM.0000000000000933",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "90",
pages = "1509--1514",
journal = "Academic Medicine",
issn = "1040-2446",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "11",

}

Recommendations for reporting mastery education research in medicine (ReMERM). / Cohen, Elaine R.; Mcgaghie, William C.; Wayne, Diane B.; Lineberry, Matthew; Yudkowsky, Rachel; Barsuk, Jeffrey H.

In: Academic Medicine, Vol. 90, No. 11, 01.11.2015, p. 1509-1514.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Recommendations for reporting mastery education research in medicine (ReMERM)

AU - Cohen, Elaine R.

AU - Mcgaghie, William C.

AU - Wayne, Diane B.

AU - Lineberry, Matthew

AU - Yudkowsky, Rachel

AU - Barsuk, Jeffrey H.

PY - 2015/11/1

Y1 - 2015/11/1

N2 - Guidelines for reporting several types of medical studies have been described in the literature. However, there are no current guidelines to report studies on mastery learning curriculum development and trainee evaluation in medical education. Such guidelines will be important because medical education is moving toward a competency-based model. The authors sought to define standards for the evaluation of mastery learning curricula using previously published guidelines in related fields and expert review. The authors reviewed previously published guidelines from clinical medicine, medical education, and the social sciences. Six authors with expertise in mastery learning curricula, performance assessment, and medical education compiled and reached agreement about a list of guidelines. The authors later circulated the list to 12 other experts and made revisions. A final list of guidelines was established and received group consensus. The Reporting Mastery Education Research in Medicine (ReMERM) guidelines have 22 categories with 38 items considered to be imperative for reporting a mastery learning research study. Details about each item, with a specific focus on those unique to mastery learning, are discussed. The ReMERM guidelines highlight the importance of developing rigorous curricula that embody reliable measures which yield valid decisions about achievement among medical learners. These guidelines should improve the quality of reporting and help educators, authors, peer reviewers, journal editors, and readers to better understand and evaluate mastery learning research. With this shift to competency-based medical education, the ReMERM guidelines should help meet medical educators' needs to achieve these new goals.

AB - Guidelines for reporting several types of medical studies have been described in the literature. However, there are no current guidelines to report studies on mastery learning curriculum development and trainee evaluation in medical education. Such guidelines will be important because medical education is moving toward a competency-based model. The authors sought to define standards for the evaluation of mastery learning curricula using previously published guidelines in related fields and expert review. The authors reviewed previously published guidelines from clinical medicine, medical education, and the social sciences. Six authors with expertise in mastery learning curricula, performance assessment, and medical education compiled and reached agreement about a list of guidelines. The authors later circulated the list to 12 other experts and made revisions. A final list of guidelines was established and received group consensus. The Reporting Mastery Education Research in Medicine (ReMERM) guidelines have 22 categories with 38 items considered to be imperative for reporting a mastery learning research study. Details about each item, with a specific focus on those unique to mastery learning, are discussed. The ReMERM guidelines highlight the importance of developing rigorous curricula that embody reliable measures which yield valid decisions about achievement among medical learners. These guidelines should improve the quality of reporting and help educators, authors, peer reviewers, journal editors, and readers to better understand and evaluate mastery learning research. With this shift to competency-based medical education, the ReMERM guidelines should help meet medical educators' needs to achieve these new goals.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84945443797&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84945443797&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000933

DO - 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000933

M3 - Article

C2 - 26375270

AN - SCOPUS:84945443797

VL - 90

SP - 1509

EP - 1514

JO - Academic Medicine

JF - Academic Medicine

SN - 1040-2446

IS - 11

ER -