TY - JOUR
T1 - Recovery of online sentence processing in aphasia
T2 - Eye movement changes resulting from treatment of underlying forms
AU - Mack, Jennifer E.
AU - Thompson, Cynthia K.
N1 - Funding Information:
The work reported here was part of a larger, National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders-funded multisite Clinical Research Center, the Center for the Neurobiology of Language Recovery (CNLR), Grant NIH-P50-DC012283, awarded to C. K. Thompson. It was also supported by National Institutes of Health Grant NIH-DC001948, awarded to C. K. Thompson. The authors would like to thank the research participants and their families and caregivers, as well as Elena Barbieri, Katrin Bovbjerg, Sarah Chandler, Brianne Dougherty, Stephanie Gutierrez, Mahir Mameledzija, Michaela Nerantzini, Caitlin Radnis, and Matthew Walenski, for assistance with data collection, data analysis, and helpful discussions.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - Purpose: The present study tested whether (and how) language treatment changed online sentence processing in individuals with aphasia. Method: Participants with aphasia (n = 10) received a 12-week program of Treatment of Underlying Forms (Thompson & Shapiro, 2005) focused on production and comprehension of passive sentences. Before and after treatment, participants performed a sentence-picture matching task with active and passive sentences as eye movements were tracked. Twelve age-matched controls also performed the task once each. Results: In the age-matched group, eye movements indicated agent-first predictive processing after hearing the subject noun, followed by rapid thematic reanalysis after hearing the verb form. Pretreatment eye movements in the participants with aphasia showed no predictive agent-first processing, and more accurate thematic analysis in active compared to passive sentences. After treatment, which resulted in improved offline passive sentence production and comprehension, participants were more likely to respond correctly when they made agent-first eye movements early in the sentence, showed equally reliable thematic analysis in active and passive sentences, and were less likely to use a spatially based alternative response strategy. Conclusions: These findings suggest that treatment focused on improving sentence production and comprehension supports the emergence of more normal-like sentence comprehension processes.
AB - Purpose: The present study tested whether (and how) language treatment changed online sentence processing in individuals with aphasia. Method: Participants with aphasia (n = 10) received a 12-week program of Treatment of Underlying Forms (Thompson & Shapiro, 2005) focused on production and comprehension of passive sentences. Before and after treatment, participants performed a sentence-picture matching task with active and passive sentences as eye movements were tracked. Twelve age-matched controls also performed the task once each. Results: In the age-matched group, eye movements indicated agent-first predictive processing after hearing the subject noun, followed by rapid thematic reanalysis after hearing the verb form. Pretreatment eye movements in the participants with aphasia showed no predictive agent-first processing, and more accurate thematic analysis in active compared to passive sentences. After treatment, which resulted in improved offline passive sentence production and comprehension, participants were more likely to respond correctly when they made agent-first eye movements early in the sentence, showed equally reliable thematic analysis in active and passive sentences, and were less likely to use a spatially based alternative response strategy. Conclusions: These findings suggest that treatment focused on improving sentence production and comprehension supports the emergence of more normal-like sentence comprehension processes.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019753232&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85019753232&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-L-16-0108
DO - 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-L-16-0108
M3 - Article
C2 - 28474086
AN - SCOPUS:85019753232
SN - 1092-4388
VL - 60
SP - 1299
EP - 1315
JO - Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders
JF - Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders
IS - 5
ER -