Reduced Accuracy of Intake Screening Questionnaires Tied to Quality Metrics

Jodi Simon*, Jeffrey Panzer, Katherine M. Wright, Abbey Ekong, Patrick Driscoll, Nivedita Mohanty, Christine A. Sinsky

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Clinical workflows that prioritize repetitive patient intake screening to meet performance metrics may have unintended consequences. This retrospective analysis of electronic health record data from 24 Federally Qualified Health Centers assessed effectiveness and accuracy of the 2-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2) for depression screening and Generalized Anxiety Disorder 2 (GAD-2) for anxiety screening from 2019 to 2021. Scores of over 91% of PHQ-2 and GAD-2 tests indicated low likelihood of depression or anxiety, which diverged markedly from published literature on screening outcomes. Visit-based screenings linked to performance metrics may not be delivering the intended value in a real-world setting and risk distracting clinical effort from other high value activities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)444-447
Number of pages4
JournalAnnals of family medicine
Volume21
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2023

Keywords

  • PHQ-9
  • administrative burden
  • health care quality
  • performance measures
  • physician burnout
  • practice-based research
  • quality improvement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Family Practice

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reduced Accuracy of Intake Screening Questionnaires Tied to Quality Metrics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this