Refining emergency severity index triage criteria

Paula Tanabe*, Debbie Travers, Nicki Gilboy, Alex Rosenau, Gina Sierzega, Valerie Rupp, Zoran Martinovich, James G. Adams

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

49 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: The Emergency Severity Index (ESI) version 3 is a five-level triage acuity scale with demonstrated reliability and validity. Patients are rated from ESI level 1 (highest acuity) to ESI level 5 (lowest acuity). Clinical experience has demonstrated two levels of ESI level 2 patients: those who require immediate intervention and those who are stable to wait for at least ten minutes. Studies have found that few patients are rated ESI level 1, and it has been suggested that revisions to the ESI might result in appropriate reclassification of some sickest level 2 patients as level 1. The purpose of this study was to identify level 2 patients who might be reclassified as level 1 patients. Methods: This was a multisite, prospective study. The authors identified ESI level 2 patients who required immediate, lifesaving intervention and calculated chi-square statistics and odds ratios for variables that predicted which ESI level 2 patients actually received immediate intervention. Results: Immediate lifesaving interventions were provided for 117 (20.2%) of the 589 patients included in the study. Seventeen predictors of the need for immediate intervention were identified. The strongest predictor was the triage nurse's judgment of the need for immediate intervention, especially airway and medications. Conclusions: Specific clinical findings at triage for a subset of ESI level 2 patients were associated with immediate delivery of lifesaving interventions. Revisions to the ESI level 1 criteria may be beneficial.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)497-501
Number of pages5
JournalAcademic Emergency Medicine
Volume12
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2005

Fingerprint

Triage
Emergencies
Reproducibility of Results
Odds Ratio
Nurses
Prospective Studies

Keywords

  • Emergency department
  • Emergency severity index
  • Triage

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Tanabe, P., Travers, D., Gilboy, N., Rosenau, A., Sierzega, G., Rupp, V., ... Adams, J. G. (2005). Refining emergency severity index triage criteria. Academic Emergency Medicine, 12(6), 497-501. https://doi.org/10.1197/j.aem.2004.12.015
Tanabe, Paula ; Travers, Debbie ; Gilboy, Nicki ; Rosenau, Alex ; Sierzega, Gina ; Rupp, Valerie ; Martinovich, Zoran ; Adams, James G. / Refining emergency severity index triage criteria. In: Academic Emergency Medicine. 2005 ; Vol. 12, No. 6. pp. 497-501.
@article{d5f0348961aa4fbbb0659f56490b2b71,
title = "Refining emergency severity index triage criteria",
abstract = "Objectives: The Emergency Severity Index (ESI) version 3 is a five-level triage acuity scale with demonstrated reliability and validity. Patients are rated from ESI level 1 (highest acuity) to ESI level 5 (lowest acuity). Clinical experience has demonstrated two levels of ESI level 2 patients: those who require immediate intervention and those who are stable to wait for at least ten minutes. Studies have found that few patients are rated ESI level 1, and it has been suggested that revisions to the ESI might result in appropriate reclassification of some sickest level 2 patients as level 1. The purpose of this study was to identify level 2 patients who might be reclassified as level 1 patients. Methods: This was a multisite, prospective study. The authors identified ESI level 2 patients who required immediate, lifesaving intervention and calculated chi-square statistics and odds ratios for variables that predicted which ESI level 2 patients actually received immediate intervention. Results: Immediate lifesaving interventions were provided for 117 (20.2{\%}) of the 589 patients included in the study. Seventeen predictors of the need for immediate intervention were identified. The strongest predictor was the triage nurse's judgment of the need for immediate intervention, especially airway and medications. Conclusions: Specific clinical findings at triage for a subset of ESI level 2 patients were associated with immediate delivery of lifesaving interventions. Revisions to the ESI level 1 criteria may be beneficial.",
keywords = "Emergency department, Emergency severity index, Triage",
author = "Paula Tanabe and Debbie Travers and Nicki Gilboy and Alex Rosenau and Gina Sierzega and Valerie Rupp and Zoran Martinovich and Adams, {James G.}",
year = "2005",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1197/j.aem.2004.12.015",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "497--501",
journal = "Academic Emergency Medicine",
issn = "1069-6563",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

Tanabe, P, Travers, D, Gilboy, N, Rosenau, A, Sierzega, G, Rupp, V, Martinovich, Z & Adams, JG 2005, 'Refining emergency severity index triage criteria', Academic Emergency Medicine, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 497-501. https://doi.org/10.1197/j.aem.2004.12.015

Refining emergency severity index triage criteria. / Tanabe, Paula; Travers, Debbie; Gilboy, Nicki; Rosenau, Alex; Sierzega, Gina; Rupp, Valerie; Martinovich, Zoran; Adams, James G.

In: Academic Emergency Medicine, Vol. 12, No. 6, 01.06.2005, p. 497-501.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Refining emergency severity index triage criteria

AU - Tanabe, Paula

AU - Travers, Debbie

AU - Gilboy, Nicki

AU - Rosenau, Alex

AU - Sierzega, Gina

AU - Rupp, Valerie

AU - Martinovich, Zoran

AU - Adams, James G.

PY - 2005/6/1

Y1 - 2005/6/1

N2 - Objectives: The Emergency Severity Index (ESI) version 3 is a five-level triage acuity scale with demonstrated reliability and validity. Patients are rated from ESI level 1 (highest acuity) to ESI level 5 (lowest acuity). Clinical experience has demonstrated two levels of ESI level 2 patients: those who require immediate intervention and those who are stable to wait for at least ten minutes. Studies have found that few patients are rated ESI level 1, and it has been suggested that revisions to the ESI might result in appropriate reclassification of some sickest level 2 patients as level 1. The purpose of this study was to identify level 2 patients who might be reclassified as level 1 patients. Methods: This was a multisite, prospective study. The authors identified ESI level 2 patients who required immediate, lifesaving intervention and calculated chi-square statistics and odds ratios for variables that predicted which ESI level 2 patients actually received immediate intervention. Results: Immediate lifesaving interventions were provided for 117 (20.2%) of the 589 patients included in the study. Seventeen predictors of the need for immediate intervention were identified. The strongest predictor was the triage nurse's judgment of the need for immediate intervention, especially airway and medications. Conclusions: Specific clinical findings at triage for a subset of ESI level 2 patients were associated with immediate delivery of lifesaving interventions. Revisions to the ESI level 1 criteria may be beneficial.

AB - Objectives: The Emergency Severity Index (ESI) version 3 is a five-level triage acuity scale with demonstrated reliability and validity. Patients are rated from ESI level 1 (highest acuity) to ESI level 5 (lowest acuity). Clinical experience has demonstrated two levels of ESI level 2 patients: those who require immediate intervention and those who are stable to wait for at least ten minutes. Studies have found that few patients are rated ESI level 1, and it has been suggested that revisions to the ESI might result in appropriate reclassification of some sickest level 2 patients as level 1. The purpose of this study was to identify level 2 patients who might be reclassified as level 1 patients. Methods: This was a multisite, prospective study. The authors identified ESI level 2 patients who required immediate, lifesaving intervention and calculated chi-square statistics and odds ratios for variables that predicted which ESI level 2 patients actually received immediate intervention. Results: Immediate lifesaving interventions were provided for 117 (20.2%) of the 589 patients included in the study. Seventeen predictors of the need for immediate intervention were identified. The strongest predictor was the triage nurse's judgment of the need for immediate intervention, especially airway and medications. Conclusions: Specific clinical findings at triage for a subset of ESI level 2 patients were associated with immediate delivery of lifesaving interventions. Revisions to the ESI level 1 criteria may be beneficial.

KW - Emergency department

KW - Emergency severity index

KW - Triage

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=19544369520&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=19544369520&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1197/j.aem.2004.12.015

DO - 10.1197/j.aem.2004.12.015

M3 - Article

C2 - 15930399

AN - SCOPUS:19544369520

VL - 12

SP - 497

EP - 501

JO - Academic Emergency Medicine

JF - Academic Emergency Medicine

SN - 1069-6563

IS - 6

ER -

Tanabe P, Travers D, Gilboy N, Rosenau A, Sierzega G, Rupp V et al. Refining emergency severity index triage criteria. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2005 Jun 1;12(6):497-501. https://doi.org/10.1197/j.aem.2004.12.015